Film photography is enjoying a resurgence in popularity, but unfortunately, so are used film camera prices. Granted, analog cameras are still bargains compared to new digital cameras, but some of the best-known models are creeping up in value, and as the film photography community discovers more hidden gems, their prices rise as well.

But film camera prices aren’t always based on quality or features; more often than not, it’s the fondly-remembered cameras that demand higher prices. Happily, there are plenty of less-popular cameras—often from the same manufacturer!—that can do the job just as well as their better-known brethren. In this article, we’ll talk about 10 well-known and expensive cameras, explain why they demand the prices that they do, and introduce you to reasonably-priced alternatives that do the job just as well—and some for much less money.

Skip: The Nikon F4 or F5

The Nikon F4 and F5 were the go-to professional film cameras from the late 1980s until the mid-2000s. Built like tanks, they were—and still are—tools designed to get the shot under any circumstances. Today, the F4 and F5 are highly regarded and highly priced—we’re talking $200 to $350 for a body in usable condition, and double that for a mint rig that hasn’t led the hard life so typical of these workhorses.

Instead buy: The Nikon N8008/N8008s

Related: The best used camera to buy right now

Back in the ‘90s, many F4/F5-toting pros kept a Nikon N8008 in their bag as a backup. Introduced concurrently with the F4, the N8008 was Nikons’ top consumer camera, with sophisticated-for-the-time matrix metering and a fast autofocus system. (It was also an incubator for the F5’s DSLR-like interface.) Like its pro-grade brother, the N8008 almost always gets the shot. The N8008 and N8008s (a later model with a spot-metering mode; they’re called F-801/801s outside North America) lives in the shadow of the more-advanced N90, and as a result, it’s largely underappreciated and underpriced: Bodies sell for a mere $20-$50, a ridiculous bargain for such a sophisticated camera.

Skip: A Hasselblad 500-series Medium Format camera

Hasselblad is often labeled as the Rolls-Royce of film photography, and the 500-series Medium Format cameras certainly are impressive machines. Not only are they exceptionally well-engineered and well-crafted, but they are also relatively small and light for their film size. But man-oh-man, are they expensive! A complete 500 C/M rig (body, lens, viewfinder and film back) will set you back at least two grand—likely more—and lenses aren’t cheap either.

Instead buy: A Bronica SQ-series Medium Format camera

Bronica cameras were often referred to as “Japanese Hasselblads”. Like the ‘Blad, the Bronica SQ is a square-format leaf-shutter SLR that is compact and light. The optics are excellent, the bodies are reliable, and you should be able to assemble a complete system for less than $1000, and closer to $500 if you are willing to patiently watch the auction sites. If you prefer a rectangular 6×4.5cm negative format, the Bronica ETRS and Mamiya 645-series are bargains as well.

Skip: The Nikon FM2/FM2n

Nikon’s FM2 is among the most prized of 35mm film SLRs, and with good reason: It’s all-mechanical (which means it can operate without batteries), has a fantastic feature set, and uses Nikon’s outstanding lenses. No surprise, then, that it’s one of the more expensive 35mm SLRs on the used market, with working examples easily fetching between $250 and $500.

Instead buy: The Nikon FM

The irony here is that the FM2’s predecessor, the FM, sells in the $100 to $200 range, sometimes even cheaper. The older FM has a slower top shutter speed (1/1000 sec vs 1/4000 sec) and slower flash sync speed (1/125 sec vs 1/200 sec or 1/250 sec for the 2n), and… that’s about it. Under the skin, the FM has similarly robust all-mechanical construction for which the FM2 is prized, and if you can do without the faster shutter speeds, it’s a great bargain. An even cheaper alternative is the Nikkormat FT2, which is bigger and heavier than the FMs but fully compatible with Nikon’s less-expensive pre-AI lenses.

Skip: The Canon AE-1 Program

The AE-1 Program was Canon’s first consumer-grade camera to have a program mode, one that could set both aperture and shutter speed. It was a strong seller in its day and remains popular with those transitioning from digital to film, as it combines that old-school SLR feel with the ease of fully automatic exposure control. No surprise, then, that the AE-1 Program commands high prices—$150 to $300 in good working order.

Instead buy: The Nikon FG

Introduced in 1982 as a low-cost AE-1 Program competitor, the FG is one of the most controversial Nikon bodies, derided among Nikon purists for its built-to-a-price-point construction. Though it lacks the heft and feel of other Nikons, read online reviews and you’ll see that most modern-day FG owners (your author included) love them. The FG is small and light and provides aperture-priority, shutter-priority, and full-auto program modes with all Nikon AI-S manual focus lenses. Thanks to its poor reputation, it’s easy to snag an FG for $75 or less.

Skip: A Rollei Rolleiflex TLR

Mention twin-lens reflex cameras and many film photographers imagine a Rolleiflex. Designed with German precision, Rollei’s Medium Format TLRs are elegant, reliable, and admirably small and light. And in their day they were prized by both casual snapshooters and professional photographers. Their well-earned regard translates to high prices: Depending on the model, Rolleiflex cameras range from $300 to $2,500 or more, and even Rollei’s lower-end Rolleicord cameras go for $200 and up.

Instead buy: A Yashica TLR

The Japanese-made Yashica twin-lens camera was designed as an affordable alternative to the Rolleiflex. But don’t let its budget status fool you, Yashicas are high-quality cameras. For some reason, though, these fine TLRs continue to lurk in Rollei’s shadow. Happily, this is reflected in their prices: Working Yaschicas sell in the $50 to $300 range. You might also consider the Mamiya C220 and C330, rare among TLRs in that they have interchangeable lenses. They’re larger, heavier, and more expensive than the Yaschicas—figure $250 to $500—but they too are excellent cameras.

Skip: The Pentax K1000

The K1000 is one of the best-known 35mm SLRs in the film world, largely because Pentax kept it in production for an epic twenty-one years, from 1976 to 1997. Cheaply priced when new and virtually indestructible, the Pentax K1000 became the go-to student camera for generations of photographers and is fondly remembered today. That nostalgia keeps prices up: Despite a massive supply, working K1000s routinely sell between $120 and $150, which is rather steep considering the K1000’s limited feature set.

Instead buy: The Pentax KM

What many photographers don’t realize is that Pentax derived the K1000 from their KM of 1975-77. The KM is actually a more feature-rich camera; its self-timer and depth-of-field preview were eliminated from the K1000 in order to get the price down. There’s one other big difference between the KM and the K1000: How much they cost today. Despite having more features, the lesser-known KM routinely sells for under $100. If the K1000’s slightly-higher price tag isn’t a budget-buster, though, consider your author’s favorite Pentax, the KX, which uses the same mechanism with a mirror lock-up and a better light meter.

Skip: A Leica M-series rangefinder

Are Leica’s legendary 35mm rangefinder cameras worth their sky-high prices? That debate will likely never be settled, but with the price of entry starting around $1,500 for less-desirable models and rising well above $5,000 for a nice M6—and that’s before lenses!—it’s a question for which few of us will have the opportunity to give an informed answer.

Instead buy: A Voigtländer Bessa R or R-2

Voigtländer is another German brand, except the Bessa R isn’t exactly German—it’s made by Cosina, a Japanese company that has manufactured cameras and lenses for numerous other well-known brands. Hard-core Leica fans might dismiss the Voigtländer as a plastic knock-off, but those who have used both cameras don’t seem to find the Bessa’s performance lacking. The Bessa R uses the 39mm Leica screw mount while the R2 uses the Leica M-mount. And while the Bessas don’t come cheap—figure $500 to $1,500—they are a great value compared to Leica. (Note that the Bessa T and Bessa L are less expensive, but the T has no viewfinder and the L lacks both viewfinder and rangefinder.)

Skip: The Nikon FE or FE-2

The FE-series was Nikon’s state-of-the-art consumer camera throughout most of the 1980s. A stablemate of the mechanical FM, the FE features an electronic shutter with an aperture-priority automatic exposure mode along with full manual control. Though cheaper than the FM-series cameras, the FEs still command healthy prices in the $100-$300 range.

Instead buy: The Ricoh XR-2 or XR-2s

Back in the 1970s and ‘80s, Ricoh was known for making feature-packed cameras at discount prices. The XR-2 and XR-2s (the latter accepts a power winder) have a similar feature set to the FE, including a match-needle meter display, shutter speed range of 1/1000 sec to 4 sec (the FE goes to 8 sec), and aperture readout in the viewfinder. Ricoh XR cameras are compatible with Pentax K-mount lenses, which are cheaper than Nikkor and of comparable optical quality (though Ricoh’s own Rikenon lenses are fine, too). Their plastic bodies feel a bit cheap, but don’t be fooled—Ricoh was an early adopter of durable polycarbonate, two decades before Canon. You’ll find the XR-2 for $50 or less, and the Sears-branded version, the KS Auto, is even cheaper.

Skip: The Pentax LX

Back in the 1970s and ‘80s, Pentax primarily pursued the consumer market, and the LX is one of their few pro-level film cameras from that era. An impressive camera, it features a weather-sealed body, interchangeable viewfinders, and an unusual hybrid shutter that is mechanically timed at high speeds (1/75 sec to 1/2000 sec) and electronic at slow speeds (4 sec to 1/60 sec). Among die-hard Pentaxians, the LX is considered the brand’s most desirable 35mm body, and prices are high, typically between $200 and $400.

Instead buy: The Pentax K2

A predecessor to the LX, the K2 was actually Pentax’s first (albeit half-hearted) attempt at a “pro” camera, and while it lacks many of the LX’s pro-specific features, it offers similar functionality and uses the same K-series lenses. Its electronically-timed shutter offers speeds of 1/1000 sec down to 8 sec, and it’s the only camera in the K-series to offer an automatic exposure mode. The K2 DMD version was compatible with a motor drive and a data back and tends to sell for a bit more than the regular K2. You’ll find K2s in the $100-to-$150 range, sometimes even cheaper.

Skip: The Minolta Maxxum 9

The Minolta Maxxum 9 (known as the Dynax 9 in Europe and the α-9 in Japan) was Minolta’s last professional 35mm body. With weatherproof construction, a highly advanced autofocus system, and a 1/12000 sec top shutter speed, the 9 was a formidable competitor for the Nikon F5. The 9 was ignored for many years, but appreciation for this camera is growing rapidly, as are prices—they’re trading in the $250-plus range and prices are on the rise.

Instead buy: The Minolta Maxxum 5

If the Maxxum 9 is a sleeper among pro bodies then its mid-level brother is a sleeper among Minolta SLRs. One of Minolta’s last advanced-amateur film bodies, the 5, encompasses many of the features of the Maxxum 7 (which some argue was a more advanced camera than the 9). It’s not weatherproof and its shutter tops out at a mere 1/4000 sec, but it has sophisticated autofocus and autoexposure systems and a plethora of programmable options. Because they appeared towards the end of the film era, many used examples have seen little use. Best yet, the Maxxum 5 is laughably cheap, with plenty on the auction sites for $30 or less. Your author bought his, in like-new condition and with a lens, for a mere $17.

The post Affordable analog: 10 alternatives to high-priced film cameras appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best overall		Peak Design Travel Tripod		SEE IT	The Peak Design tripod folds down incredibly small to save you space when traveling.
Best for hiking		Manfrotto Befree Advanced		SEE IT	This lightweight tripod fits well in the side pocket of backpacks to easily bring on your hikes.
Best rugged		3Pod Everest T3		SEE IT	The 3Pod Everest T3 offers grips on the legs and comes with spike feet for traction on different surfaces.

Carbon fiber tripods offer several very tangible advantages over their metal counterparts. They are stiffer, stronger, and more durable than aluminum. Despite those things, they also weigh significantly less than aluminum, making them a popular choice for travel and landscape photography. Of course, they also will cost you more than an aluminum tripod, but for many, it is worth it. The best carbon fiber tripods will help you get stable shots while making it easier to bring a tripod along.

• Best overall: Peak Design Travel Tripod
• Best for hiking: Manfrotto Befree Advanced
• Best rugged: 3Pod Everest T3
• Best for versatility: Manfrotto MT055CXPRO4
• Best for landscape photography: 3 Legged Thing Leo 2.0
• Best heavy-duty: Gitzo GT5533S Systematic Series 5
• Best budget: Neewer Carbon Fiber

How we chose the best carbon fiber tripods

The writers and editors at Pop Photo have decades of photography experience across the full spectrum of photographic genres and equipment. We’ve used our fair share of tripods in a wide variety of situations, from cheap plastic and heavy aluminum to more advanced carbon fiber models.

When selecting the carbon fiber tripods on this list, we aimed to choose options suitable for different pursuits, from travel to studio work. And while carbon fiber tripods are pricier than aluminum, we looked for products at various price points to suit different budgets. In addition, durability, sturdiness, and ease of use were all part of our decision-making process. Lastly, though tripods aren’t exactly feature-rich, we looked for options with enough features to make them versatile and usable in different–even challenging–situations.

The best carbon fiber tripods: Reviews & Recommendations

There is certainly no shortage of carbon fiber tripods available. Below you’ll find our favorite options for a variety of situations and use cases, so you’re sure to find one that fits your needs.

Best overall: Peak Design Travel Tripod

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Peak Design’s Travel Tripod weighs only 2.8 pounds and folds down to the width of a water bottle while still being able to support up to 20 pounds.

Specs

• Maximum height: 60 inches
• Minimum height: 5.5 inches
• Weight: 2.8 pounds
• Weight capacity: 20 pounds
• Folded length: 15.5 inches

Pros

• Includes a ball head
• Compact and lightweight
• Good height range
• Excellent strength-to-weight ratio

Cons

• Expensive
• Only two leg angles

Originally released through a Kickstarter campaign in 2019, the Peak Design Travel Tripod made waves thanks to the unique leg design. When folded down, it is just 15.5 inches tall and about the diameter of a water bottle. That makes it very easy to throw in a backpack‘s side pocket instead of fumbling with attachment points and straps.

The five-section legs can all be deployed at once with the aluminum lever locks to save time–and to look really dramatic. It can support up to 20 pounds and is very sturdy, considering its small size. The included ball head is minimal and aids in the tripod’s compact design. Instead of levers and knobs like normal tripod heads, there are simple locking and adjustment rings.

The Peak Design carbon fiber tripod can extend to 60 inches with the center column or 51.25 inches without that extended. For low angles, the center column reverses and hangs underneath the legs. There is also a removable hook on the center column, so you can easily hang weight to add stability. And this tripod comes with a slick travel bag, mobile mount, and hex wrenches. The mobile mount is a nice touch and makes this tripod excellent for all sorts of creators.

Best for hiking: Manfrotto Befree Advanced

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Its lightweight form factor but very adjustable height and 20-pound weight capacity make this a great option to take backpacking. 

Specs

• Maximum height: 59.1 inches
• Minimum height: 16 inches
• Weight: 2.8 pounds
• Weight capacity: 19.8 pounds
• Folded length: 16.1 inches

Pros

• Includes a ball head
• Lightweight and compact
• Three leg positions
• Well-designed twist lock legs

Cons

• Center column doesn’t move as smooth as the legs

Manfrotto’s Befree line has been a popular choice for travel and adventure photographers for years. The Advanced version brings a higher weight capacity to the line, able to support nearly 20 pounds. It weighs the same amount as the Peak Design tripod mentioned above, though it is slightly larger when folded down. However, it still fits nicely into a side water bottle pocket on a hiking backpack. And the extra space between the legs makes it easier to secure with a strap for peace of mind while hiking.

The Befree Advanced tripod comes with a ball head, or you can also get it with a fluid head if you need smoother movements for shooting video. The ball head offers 360 degrees of swivel and can tilt 90 degrees for portrait orientation as well. It’s easily controlled via the large knob, even if you have gloves on. The center dial in the control knob allows you to adjust the tension and get more precise positioning. 

The legs are made up of four sections and are locked into place using twist locks. Unlike other tripods I’ve used, the leg sections don’t automatically extend when untwisting the locks, which is good and bad. It takes a little more time to set up but is less of a pain when putting the tripod away or if you forget to lock one down all the way. The legs lock at three different angles, giving you lots of flexibility. 

Best rugged: 3Pod Everest T3

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: As the name suggests, the Everest T3 is built for harsh conditions. It is cold weather resistant, features CNC machined dust-proof construction, offers anti-corrosion faces, and comes with spiked feet for better traction.

Specs

• Maximum working height: 64.17 inches
• Minimum working height: 13.4 inches
• Weight: 3.2 pounds (without ball head)
• Weight capacity: 33 pounds
• Folded length: 19.7 inches

Pros

• Sturdy, heavy-duty build
• Built for harsh environments
• Comes with spiked feet for added grip
• Available with or without a ball head

Cons

• A bit bulky

Photography can take us to some wild, rugged places. The 3Pod Everest T3 is up for the challenge, thanks to a seriously rugged build. 3Pod made this tripod with CNC precision for a dust-proof design. It’s also cold weather resistant, meaning the joints will keep moving even in extreme cold. The grippy material on two of the legs makes it easier and more comfortable to hold in the cold, even if you have gloves on.

The legs of the Everest use a twist lock design for quick assembly and breakdown. It comes with 3Pod’s H4 ball head (or you can opt for a version without a head) and Arca-Type quick-release plate. The ball rotates very smoothly with just enough resistance. Two bubble levels help you ensure your shots are level in-camera. This carbon fiber tripod can extend to 5.3 feet with the center column extended or 4.4 feet without the extra extension when you need extra sturdiness. Should you need a low-angle shot, you can remove the center column to get shots as low as 13.4 inches. You can invert the center column for creative angles as well.

The main downside to the Everest T3 is that it’s a fairly bulky tripod. It weighs 3.2 pounds and is pretty long, even when folded down. But, the heavy-duty design results in a 33-pound weight capacity. Should you want something more robust, 3Pod also makes a larger version—the Everest T5—which offers a 55-pound load capacity and 6.6-foot maximum height.

Even more carbon fiber tripods to consider

If one of the three above doesn’t tick all the boxes for you, check out these additional options.

Best for versatility: Manfrotto MT055CXPRO4

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: This versatile Manfrotto tripod can go from 3.5 inches to 66.9 inches, thanks to the angle selectors on the legs and sturdy center column. Plus, it has a convenient attachment point for arms to hold accessories like reflectors.

Specs

• Maximum height: 66.9 inches
• Minimum height: 3.5 inches
• Weight: 4.6 pounds
• Weight capacity: 19.8 pounds
• Folded length: 21.3 inches

Pros

• Ample height range
• Sturdy and durable
• Center column bends 90 degrees
• Includes attachment point for accessories

Cons

• Tripod head must be purchased separately

Manfrotto has long been one of the top tripod producers. Its MT055CXPRO4 is an extremely popular tripod, and for good reason. At  4.6 pounds, it weighs a bit more than some of the other models on this list. But it is very sturdy and supports nearly 20 pounds, which is more than enough for a full-frame camera and hefty telephoto.

Each leg features Manfrotto’s Quick Power Locks (a type of lever lock), which are easy to use but extremely sturdy. The legs can be set to multiple angles, allowing you to set the tripod as low as 3.5 inches. You’ll be able to get some really dramatic and unique angles for landscapes while still getting stability from a tripod.

With the center column extended, you’ll get 66.9 inches of height. Manfrotto redesigned the center column on this carbon fiber tripod to enable one-finger operation, so you’ll be able to raise it with much less fuss. And the center column can bend 90 degrees for better versatility or more unique angles. There is an Easy Link attachment point for adding accessories like a LED light or reflector with a compatible arm.

At the top of the tripod is a bubble level that swivels 360 degrees so you can see it no matter how you have your tripod set up. But, you will need to purchase a head for this tripod separately. For most people, we’d suggest Manfrotto’s XPRO Ball Head.

Best for landscape photography: 3 Legged Thing Leo 2.0

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It can hold up to 66 pounds, so even if you use a large camera and bulky lens, you won’t have to worry about stability. And yet, the tripod only weighs 4.8 pounds, so it will still be feasible to pack on a trip.

Specs

• Maximum height: 54.3 inches
• Minimum height: 4.9 inches
• Weight: 4.8 pounds
• Weight capacity: 66 pounds
• Folded length: 14.7 inches

Pros

• Heavy weight capacity
• Good height range
• Lightweight and compact
• Highly modifiable

Cons

• Not as tall as other options

3 Legged Thing is a small British company that was launched in 2010. The Leo 2.0 has a surprising weight capacity, supporting up to 66 pounds. So even if you use a large DSLR or medium format camera with a heavy lens, this tripod will be able to handle it. And yet, the tripod only weighs 4.8 pounds with the head attached, which is only slightly heavier than the Manfrotto 055. 

One of the best things about the Leo carbon fiber tripod is that it is very modifiable. Each leg can be removed and acts as a monopod. The center column can either be removed entirely or inverted to get lower to the ground. And you can purchase tripod feet for better stability on different types of surfaces.

This tripod comes with a carrying case and also the 3 Legged Thing Toolz multi-tool for adjusting various parts of the tripod. It can’t extend quite as high as other options, but the ability to modify it so much and the large weight capacity are huge benefits. 

Best heavy-duty: Gitzo GT5533S Systematic Series 5

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: The Gitzo Systematic Series 5 holds a whopping 88 pounds, making it the ideal choice for those shooting with large cameras and lenses.

Specs

• Maximum working height: 52.8 inches
• Minimum working height: 3.9 inches
• Weight: 6.2 pounds 
• Weight capacity: 88 pounds
• Folded length: 24.4 inches

Pros

• Very heavy duty
• Available in different heights and configurations
• Exceptionally sturdy
• Feet are articulating for better stability

Cons

• Center column or head must be purchased separately

If the 3 Legged Thing doesn’t provide enough stability for you, the Gitzo Systematic Series 5 will. It supports up to 88 pounds, which is ideal for those using large lenses or cameras. Even if you use a large format camera, you’ll get enough support from this carbon fiber tripod. Even when the legs’ three sections are extended, the tripod is extremely sturdy with limited flex.

The Systematic Series is unique in that they do not include center columns, unlike other tripods. Center columns are not very sturdy when extended, so it makes sense to leave that out if you want the most stability. It does, of course, limit the height you can get from the tripod, but luckily Gitzo makes different heights in this line. 

Like the 3 Legged Thing, Gitzo sells lots of accessories compatible with this tripod line. For example, should you want a center column, you can add a compatible one, as found on Gitzo’s website. You’ll also need to purchase a tripod head if you want more than the flat top plate. And there are also alternative types of feet available for better stability on different surfaces. 

Best budget: Neewer 66 Inch Carbon Fiber Tripod

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: At a much more affordable price, this budget carbon fiber tripod still offers support for up to 26.5 pounds and can convert into a monopod.

Specs

• Maximum height: 66 inches
• Minimum height: 23.2 inches
• Weight: 3.40 pounds
• Weight capacity: 26.5 pounds
• Folded length: 19.3 inches

Pros

• Can be broken down into a monopod
• Affordable
• Comes with a ball head
• Center column can be inverted

Cons

• Does not go very low
• Not as durable as other options

Neewar is fairly well known for its affordable lighting and accessories. Like its other gear, its carbon fiber tripod is much more affordable than other brands but still offers a good amount of quality and features. Unlike more expensive options, it comes with a ball head, so you don’t need to purchase it separately. 

It supports up to 26.5 pounds, so even somewhat heavy cameras and lenses will work. And it only weighs 3.4 pounds, so it won’t be too much trouble to pack with you on trips. You can break it down into a monopod, so it is multifunctional. And the center column can be inverted if you want low to the ground shots. The legs have three sections and are controlled via twist locks.

Of course, with the budget price comes some downsides, though they are luckily minor. The included ball head isn’t all that stable, so you may want to invest in a better tripod head if you will be pushing the weight limit of this tripod. And some have had issues with pieces breaking after not all that much use. It may not last as long as more expensive options, but if you want to get started with a tripod without breaking the bank, this still is a great option.

Things to consider before buying the best carbon fiber tripods

Tripods, in general, aren’t exactly feature-packed, as they are pretty basic, straightforward pieces of equipment. But, that said, there are still some vital things to pay attention to before purchasing to ensure that it will fit your needs and work with your camera setup. 

Weight

Though carbon fiber tripods weigh less than their aluminum counterparts, their weight still varies across different brands and models. And while you may assume you need to find the lightest option, that won’t always be the best. Lightweight tripods lose stability unless you add weight to them. That could be via sandbags or a backpack hung from the center column. Without added weight, the tripod may be prone to getting blown over by strong winds or tipped over if bumped. So, if you are looking for a sturdy option and don’t want to fuss with adding weight, go with a heavier tripod.

On the flip side, if you travel or like to have a tripod while hiking, be sure to go with a lightweight option. Tripods are never all that convenient to carry along, but if it weighs a lot, you definitely won’t want to bring it along. 

Capacity

Beyond the weight of the tripod itself, tripods will be able to support different sizes of cameras and lenses. For example, some tripods are only suitable for lightweight mirrorless setups with small lenses, whereas others can hold heavy medium-format cameras. 

Before purchasing a tripod, be sure to do a rough calculation of what your heaviest setup will be. Look up the weight of your camera and largest lens to ensure that the tripod and tripod head you are considering is able to support that much weight.

Maximum and minimum height

All tripods will be able to extend only so far. Some will be able to go quite high with the help of a center column, while others won’t go beyond eye level, if that. If you like to get serious height with your tripod for unique perspectives, be sure to look for a tripod with a tall maximum height. 

On the other side, some tripods can’t go lower than the closed length of the tripod. Some, however, allow you to bend the legs out, resulting in the camera sitting very low, sometimes just inches off the ground. This ability is ideal for landscape photographers who want dramatic angles or like to focus on things in the foreground. If you want more flexibility with angles, be sure to look for a tripod that can get low as well as high.

FAQs

Final thoughts on the best carbon fiber tripods

• Best overall: Manfrotto MT055CXPRO4
• Best for travel: Peak Design Travel Tripod
• Best for hiking: Manfrotto Befree Advanced
• Best for landscape photography: 3 Legged Thing Leo 2.0
• Best heavy-duty: Gitzo GT5533S Systematic Series 5
• Best for height: 3Pod Everest T3
• Best budget: Neewer Carbon Fiber

Carbon fiber tripods are not cheap pieces of gear, especially good ones. They are an investment, to be sure. But for a bit of equipment that can keep your camera safe and potentially improve your images, it is worth spending a bit more to ensure you have a reliable tripod that will last for years.

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best carbon fiber tripods for 2023, tested and reviewed appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best overall		Datacolor Spyder X2 Ultra		SEE IT	The Spyder X2 Ultra can calibrate your display in under two minutes and works with high-brightness and HDR monitors.
Best budget		Calibrite ColorChecker Display		SEE IT	This budget calibration tool will help you get accurate colors for less.
Best kit		Datacolor SpyderX Capture Pro Kit		SEE IT	This toolkit will help you get accurate colors at every step of the creative process.

Monitor calibration tools are essential for anyone looking for precision and consistency in their photography, videography, or design work. All monitors will produce slightly—or sometimes drastically—different colors, contrast levels, and degrees of brightness. Left unchecked, that variation can impact the final look of your work. Monitor calibrators are devices that sit on your monitor and measure the colors and brightness of the display. Some will also read ambient light to suggest how bright your monitor needs to be to see accurately in that environment. The best monitor calibration tools will help you get better and more consistent results in your photo editing, video editing, and printed work.

• Best overall: Datacolor Spyder X2 Ultra
• Best budget: Calibrite ColorChecker Display
• Best kit: Datacolor SpyderX Capture Pro Kit
• Best for pros: X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 Plus
• Best for Wacom displays: Wacom Color Manager

How we chose the best monitor calibration tools

The writers and editors here at Pop Photo have decades of experience in photography and have worked with most major equipment manufacturers, including monitor calibration tools. I have spent the past 10 years or so either working to oversee consistency across a group of editors or printing my own photographs, which has provided me with experience calibrating screens. 

When selecting the best monitor calibration tools, we looked at important features such as ambient light sensors and the ability to match multiple monitors. Ease of use was also critical, as calibrating your screen shouldn’t be overly challenging. Lastly, we aimed to provide products at different price points and experience levels to suit different users. 

The best monitor calibration tools: Reviews & recommendations

If left uncalibrated, your monitor’s off colors could negatively impact your edits and prints. For example, if you are editing on an extremely warm monitor, you may overcorrect and end up with overly cool images, only noticeable when viewing on your phone or other displays. Or, you could go to make prints for a client and end up with dramatically different colors and contrast from what you saw on your screen, which is never what you want a client to experience. These monitor calibration tools will help your work look consistent with accurate colors no matter what the final viewing method will be.

Best overall: Datacolor Spyder X2 Ultra

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Datacolor’s latest calibration tool is the new standard for photographers and videographers. It provides highly accurate results and allows you to calibrate multiple monitors. 

Specs

• Compatible devices: Laptops, desktop monitors, and front projectors
• Connector type: USB-C
• Ambient light sensor: Yes

Pros

• Easy to use
• Extremely fast
• Built-in ambient light sensor
• Works well with bright monitors

Cons

• Not officially compatible with OLED displays

Datacolor is one of the most well-known calibration companies. The company’s most recent release—the Spyder X2 Ultra—improves on previous versions for an even better calibration experience. One of the most notable improvements is how fast the calibration process is. Without brightness adjustments, I was able to complete calibration in just shy of a minute and a half. That’s absurdly fast for a product like this. It comes in very handy when I want to get a calibration done before printing images and don’t want to sit around waiting.

Beyond speed, the Datacolor software is incredibly easy to use, even if you’ve never calibrated a monitor before. It walks you through each step with easy-to-follow instructions. If you print your work or share it digitally, the Soft Proofing tool allows you to simulate other displays, devices, printers, ink, and more. It’s not just a tool for photographers, either. The X2 Ultra includes video calibration targets Rec. 709 and Rec. 2020.

Like previous versions, this tool has an ambient light sensor that can monitor the room you’re working in throughout the day and suggest appropriate brightness and contrast. The software can warn you to calibrate or automatically adjust brightness and contrast based on custom profiles that you’ve set up for different light levels. It supports multiple monitors and unlimited profiles, so if you have dual monitors and your laptop screen, you can ensure all three are correct. You’ll also have access to Datacolor’s Studio Match, which helps you match all of your displays so that colors, contrast, and brightness are consistent across all of them. 

The Spyder X2 is available with two different software versions. The one we have linked here—the Ultra—can calibrate monitors up to 2000 nits. It is the ideal choice for those with high-brightness and HDR monitors, such as photographers shooting tethered on outdoor shoots. If you don’t use such displays, the Elite version will save you about $30. The hardware is the same between the two, so you can always upgrade your software down the road if you opt for the Elite but decide you need high-brightness support.

Best budget: Calibrite ColorChecker Display

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Though more affordable than other options, the ColorChecker Display provides highly accurate calibration and works with laptops, desktops, and projectors.

Specs

• Compatible devices: Laptop, desktop monitors, projectors
• Connector type: USB-A
• Ambient light sensor: Yes 

Pros

• Easy to use
• Affordable
• Color matches up to four displays

Cons

• Doesn’t monitor ambient light
• Slower results

Formerly the X-Rite i1Display, this entry-level monitor calibrator offers a lot of value. It comes at a lower price than alternative options, though it still has plenty of features and is very accurate. It works with laptops, desktops, and even projectors and can color-match up to four displays. So whether you have multiple displays at your desk or your bounce between locations, it will allow you to ensure your entire setup is accurate.

The ColorChecker Display has an ambient light sensor to determine the best brightness level for comparing prints to your display. But, it does not constantly monitor ambient light like the SpyderX Pro, so you will need to do that manually if you work in a room where the light shifts significantly throughout the day. But it will remind you on a regular schedule to re-calibrate, which helps keep your display accurate over time.

Best kit: Datacolor SpyderX Capture Pro Kit

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: This kit includes all you need to calibrate your entire process, from shooting to post-processing.

Specs

• Compatible devices: Monitors and projectors
• Connector type: USB 1.1, USB 2.X, USB 3.X, and USB Type-A
• Ambient light sensor: Yes

Pros

• Includes tools for calibrating camera settings
• Easy to use
• Highly accurate
• Monitors ambient light

Cons

• Not all users will need all tools

For serious photographers who want to fine-tune every aspect of their photography, this kit from Datacolor provides all the tools you need. It includes a Spyder LensCal, which allows you to precisely measure and adjust your DSLR and lens autofocusing. It helps ensure that you miss focus less and that the camera and lens focus exactly where you want them to. Because mirrorless cameras use the main camera sensor to focus, they don’t require calibration. But, it can tell you if your lens isn’t focusing properly.

The kit also comes with the SpyderCUBE for getting accurate exposure and white balance settings by providing white and black values. And the Spyder Checkr helps achieve consistently accurate colors across different shots, days, and even cameras. As a result, your raw files will be in a much better place before you even start editing, cutting down on the time you need to sit in front of your computer.

Finally, the kit comes with Datacolor’s impressive lens-based colorimeter, the device that calibrates monitors. It works with multiple monitors and provides access to SpyderX Elite for unlimited calibration controls. The software is easy to use, guiding you through the calibration process. You can also use Datacolor’s Softproof to preview how a photo will look as a print or on different devices like tablets. You’ll be able to ensure things are accurate before you hit print or walk away from your edits.  

Best for pros: X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 Plus

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It offers excellent precision, video support, and the ability to calibrate unlimited monitors.

Specs

• Compatible devices: Monitors, projectors, scanners, printers, cameras
• Connector type: USB
• Ambient light sensor: Yes

Pros

• Calibrates and matches colors on different displays
• Supports high brightness levels
• Ideal for video work as well
• Can also calibrate printers and cameras

Cons

• Very expensive

Serious professionals need to ensure their entire kit is calibrated for utmost accuracy and consistency. This calibration kit from X-Rite offers an impressive set of features and accessories to meet those requirements. The software allows you to calibrate every step of the process, from your camera to the printer. It has presets specifically for video production, making this ideal if you do a lot of color grading on your monitor. And the included XL ruler enables you to color calibrate even large format printers. 

The included polarization filter helps cut down hot spots from reflective surfaces, resulting in better blacks and richer colors. It’s ideal for scanners, allowing you to reproduce artwork at a higher quality. Plus, the spectrophotometer has an 8mm aperture, allowing it to provide accurate results on a wide range of surfaces.

The i1Basic Pro 3 Plus allows you to create profiles for up to four displays that are connected to a single computer. And if you work in a lab setting, you can calibrate unlimited monitors that are connected to different computers. It also has a Kensington Lock port to keep it safe in public or communal settings.

Best for Wacom displays: Wacom Color Manager

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Since it’s specifically designed for Wacom devices, you’ll be able to get much more accurate results on your Cintiq screen.

Specs

• Compatible devices: Wacom products, monitors, mobile devices
• Connector type: Not provided
• Ambient light sensor: None

Pros

• Designed by X-Rite for Wacom products for better results
• Can also calibrate mobile devices
• Works with multiple monitors

Cons

• Can be more complicated to use than other devices

Though other calibrators will work on Wacom devices, Wacom collaborated with X-Rite to design this to work specifically with its products, such as the Cintiq 27QHD Creative Pen Display. It will provide results tailored explicitly to your tablet as a result. You can also use it to calibrate other monitors and displays and even use it on mobile devices.

It allows you to save profiles for your different displays, and you can create custom colors to suit your needs. Everything is very customizable, so while you can adjust based on its recommendations, you can also fine-tune settings as you see fit.

Wacom’s monitor calibration tool allows you to check the quality of your display and monitor its health over time. That way, you can know if it might be failing before things get too bad. It also provides profile reminders to keep your display accurate. 

Things to consider before buying monitor calibration tools

Screen type

Displays use different types of technology to project an image, from backlight LED to LCD or various types of technology in projectors. While most of the monitor calibration tools we’ve listed here are compatible with a wide array of displays, double-check that whichever instrument you are considering will work with your particular display.  

Ambient light sensor

The amount and type of light in the space that you have your monitor will have a significant impact on how you view your screen. For example, if you are in a room with lots of natural light, you will need different settings than if you work in a room with minimal windows. Likewise, if the artificial light in your space is very warm or cool, it will change your perception of the colors on the screen.

An ambient light sensor reads all that data and factors it into your screen calibration. Some calibration tools will not have these, however. So, if you want the utmost accuracy, be sure to look for one with an ambient light sensor. 

And if light shifts throughout the day in your workspace–which it likely does–you may want to invest in a calibrator that is able to monitor ambient light and suggest settings throughout the day. Otherwise, you can manually take readings at different times of the day and create profiles based on that, but it will take more time.  

Speed

How fast a calibration tool can provide results may not matter to some, but it will be essential for others. It may be especially important if you are calibrating multiple displays on a regular basis. Unfortunately, many manufacturers will not provide speed data in the product specs, but some will. If speed is important, be sure to look closely for that information.

Customizability

Some entry-level systems will only allow you to make automatic adjustments without much insight into the process. That’s fine for the average person who is just looking to improve their monitor’s out-of-the-box experience but falls short in high-end professional settings. That’s especially true if you’re doing custom printing work or doing work in less-than-optimal conditions.

FAQs

Final thoughts on monitor calibration tools

• Best overall: Datacolor Spyder X2 Ultra
• Best budget: Calibrite ColorChecker Display
• Best kit: Datacolor SpyderX Capture Pro Kit
• Best for pros: X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 Plus
• Best for Wacom displays: Wacom Color Manager

Despite being rather technical pieces of equipment, the best calibration tools are easy to use and provide accurate results. For those serious about their photography or video, it is an essential tool that will make a difference. You’ll get better photos, videos, and prints with less work and will have more consistent results over time. 

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best monitor calibration tools of 2023 appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Peak Design’s Camera Cubes, launched in 2017, have been incredibly popular products for photographers looking for module protection for their gear. They provide protection for your equipment in any bag, not just dedicated camera bags, making it easier to bring your gear anywhere. And now, the camera equipment company has announced an updated version of these protective bags with many important upgrades. That includes better weatherproofing, better dividers, and more handles. Also, two new sizes—X-Small and Smedium (that’s not a typo)—join the original Small, Medium, and Large options.

Peak Design was kind enough to send me two sizes (X-small and Large) of the new bags to test out ahead of the launch, so I was able to get some hands-on experience to share. Here’s what’s new about the Camera Cubes V2 and what you can expect from the bags.

What are the Peak Design Camera Cubes?

Peak Design manufactured the Camera Cubes to nest perfectly in its Travel and Outdoor bags, but you can toss them in just about anything since they offer padding on all sides. When you are using the Peak Design Camera Cubes with Peak Design bags, the included C-Clips allow you to securely attach the Camera Cube so that it doesn’t slide around.

Using camera cubes also allows your camera backpack to do double duty when you don’t need camera gear, meaning you don’t need to buy as many packs. You could even get away with not buying a photo-focused bag at all, which would save you lots of money. And Peak Design’s Camera Cube can even be used as stand-alone bags (especially the X-Small). They feature cord hook connection points, so you can toss on a camera strap to carry the bag.

Finally, these Peak Design bags are 100 percent carbon neutral and are the only camera cubes on the market that are Fair Trade Certified, just like all of Peak Design’s bags.

What’s new in the Peak Design Camera Cube V2?

Peak Design is always very thoughtful with how it designs its products, and that is very evident in the changes it made to the already excellent Camera Cubes.

New sizes

First, the two new sizes join the lineup of Small, Medium, and Large. The X-Small exterior measures 9 x 4.7 x 5.9 inches and offers an internal volume of 3.5 liters. It comes with two extra small dividers. This size is ideal for small and minimal mirrorless setups or would also work well for a drone or drone accessories. I was able to fit my Sony a7 III with the Sony 24-70mm f/4 attached, along with the small Kodak H35 film camera. It was snug around my mirrorless camera but did fit.

The Smedium (no, that’s not a typo; it is really named Smedium) Camera Cube V2, as you might guess, sits between the Small and Medium. Its exterior measures 12.2 x 9.25 x 5.9 inches, and the internal volume is 10 liters. The Smedium comes with two medium dividers, one small shelf divider, one small divider, two extra small dividers, and one detachable pocket.

The existing three sizes maintain the same sizes as the original versions but get all of the same upgrades.

Build quality upgrades

Peak Design kept the weatherproof 160D 100% recycled nylon canvas shell of the first version of the Camera Cubes. But, in order to make them even more weatherproof, they switched to new zippers called Ultra Zips. There is also weatherproof taping on all external seams to keep all water out. The exterior also gets even more grab handles—one on each side—making them easier to carry and grab out of your bag when necessary.

In the Camera Cubes V2, Peak Design expanded the main opening to provide better access to gear, including items on the sides and in the corners. The top flap folds entirely out of the way, so you won’t have to fumble with holding it open while trying to get something out. One really smart feature is the removable padding in the lid. If you use a Peak Design bag with padding on all sides (such as the Travel Backpack) and want one-zip access to your gear, you can take out that padding and tuck the top panel away for quicker, easier access. The Medium and Large sizes also feature a zippered opening on two sides, which enables quick entry when using bags with side openings.

The flexible dividers also get an upgrade in the V2 version. They offer a cleaner aesthetic and come in even more sizes so that you can fully customize your setup. The entire interior is also softer in the V2 bags.

Finally, the bags are all about 10 to 15 percent lighter than their predecessors. That’s not a ton, but when you’re lugging around a camera backpack when hiking or traveling, every bit of weight matters.

Peak Design Camera Cube V2 in use

Admittedly, I was not a Camera Cube person originally. I’ve always stuck to dedicated camera bags with built-in protection. But that has been extremely limiting in certain situations, meaning I either don’t bring my camera somewhere or deal with a bag that’s less than ideal for a given situation. The Camera Cubes V2 have changed my ways.

I recently went out for a brief SUP adventure and wanted to have my camera on hand, but don’t have a camera bag that I would trust if it happened to fall overboard for some reason. I have an EXPED waterproof bag, which is not a dedicated camera bag. But, with the X-Small Camera Cube, I was able to safely bring my camera along by tossing it in the waterproof bag. Likewise, for bigger trips, I could easily through the Large in a bigger duffel to take my entire kit but still keep a relatively small camera backpack on me with select pieces of gear as needed.

As with all other Peak Design gear I’ve used, the Camera Cubes V2 are made of extremely quality and durable materials. I haven’t been using them for terribly long, but they feel like they will last forever. The water that got on the bag when I was SUPing beaded up and slid away, with no water soaking into the material at all. The interior is nice and soft. The flexible dividers are just sturdy enough and feature strong velcro to keep them in place even with lots of movement. And the wide opening is awesome to have. It makes it easier to pack in my gear and allows me to easily see what I have when I’m looking for something.

SEE IT

Pricing & availability

All sizes of the Peak Design Camera Cube V2 are available for purchase now. The X-Small is $49.95, Small is $59.95, Smedium is $69.95, Medium is $89.95, and Large is $109.95.

If you don’t mind missing out on the upgrades, Peak Design is selling the V1 versions for 20 percent off as long as supplies last.

The post The Peak Design Camera Cubes V2 offer versatile gear protection appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best matte		Canson Infinity Rag Photographique Matte		SEE IT	This Canson Infinity paper is nice and thick and provides a matte finish with excellent colors
Best for framing		Epson Ultra Premium Luster		SEE IT	The luster finish provides a subtle gloss to reduce glare and reflections.
Best glossy		Canon Photo Paper Pro Platinum		SEE IT	The Pro Platinum paper provides high gloss to make colors shine.

When it comes to printing photographs, photo paper tends to take a back seat to printers. While a quality printer is absolutely essential, the photo paper you choose will have a profound impact on how the final image looks in your hands or on the wall. With a wide range of paper types, you can drastically alter your images just with paper selection alone. The best photo paper will give you quality colors and exceptional detail, making your prints sure to impress.

• Best matte: Canson Infinity Rag Photographique Matte
• Best for framing: Epson Ultra Premium Luster
• Best glossy: Canon Photo Paper Pro Platinum
• Best for art prints: Hahnemühle Photo Rag 308 gsm
• Best for black and white: Canson Infinity Platine Fibre Rag 310gsm

How we picked the best photo paper

The writers and editors have decades of experience in nearly every genre and area of photography. I have been printing my own photographs or dealing with commercial printers for around ten years. I have tested many different paper options and printer-specific results during that time. When selecting the papers for this list, I relied on that hands-on experience, as well as the experience of photographers I know. Every photographer and subject matter has different needs and tastes, so I focused on a range of styles and finishes to fit. I looked at weight, thickness, brightness, OBAs, and the range of size options for all papers. Finally, I also chose options from different brands to cover a broader spectrum of papers.

The best photo paper: Reviews & recommendations

Whether you are an artist printing photos for galleries or a portrait photographer selling prints to clients, the right photo paper can make all the difference. The options below are ideal for a range of photographers and types of photographs, so you’re sure to find something that works for you.

Best matte: Canson Infinity Rag Photographique Matte 310 gsm

SEE IT

Specs

• Sheet size options: 8.5 x 11 inches, 11 x 17 inches, 13 x 19 inches, 17 x 22 inches
• Roll size options: 17” x 50’, 24” x 50’, 36” x 50’, 44” x 50’, 60” x 50’
• Base material: 100% Cotton rag
• Whiteness: 89.8%
• Weight: 310 gsm
• Thickness: 18.3 mil

Pros

• Available in 210 or 310 gsm
• Available as one or two-sided
• Wide selection of sizes in sheets or rolls
• Archival quality

Cons

• Pricey for everyday users
• Must search at specialty stores for most sizes

Canson is one of the higher-end paper producers and has been making quality photo paper for a long time. Many photographers prefer the look and feel of matte paper, and the Infinity Rag Photographique Matte is one of the best. It comes in 210 and 310 gsm and has an extensive range of sizes, both in sheet and roll form. With their largest roll, you can print up to 60 inches on the short side, which is massive.

Both weight options have a nice heft, making them sturdy enough to stand up to some large print sizes (still with delicate handling, of course). It produces some rich blacks and highly accurate colors, as long as you are using quality inks and a color-calibrated monitor, that is. It has excellent whiteness without any OBAs, meaning it is fully archival and museum-quality. When handled well, your prints will last for a very long time.

Best for framing: Epson Ultra Premium Luster

SEE IT

Specs

• Size options: 8.5 x 11”, 13 x 19”, 11.7 x 16.5” (A3)
• Base material: Alpha cellulose
• Brightness: 97%
• Weight: 240 gsm
• Thickness: 10 mil 

Pros

• Vivid, accurate color
• Dries instantly
• Ideal finish for framing
• Available in packs with up to 250 sheets

Cons

• Not a huge selection of sizes
• Not available in rolls

The Epson Ultra Premium Luster paper has been my go-to paper choice for years, especially when I know I will be framing a print behind glass. The luster finish has some gloss, 16 percent at 60° to be precise, to produce rich colors and contrast, but it is subtle enough that you don’t have to contend with much glare. That opens up the possibilities of where you can hang the print as well.

Unfortunately, this paper only comes in four size options. It is also not available in rolls, so you will need to keep reloading your paper feeder if you print a lot. But the Ultra Premium Luster paper has 97 percent opacity, meaning some light will shine through the paper, giving nice depth if hung without mounting of any sort. It also dries instantly after printing, so you don’t have to worry about accidentally touching the print when taking it away from the printer (just watch for fingerprints).

Best glossy: Canon Photo Paper Pro Platinum

SEE IT

Specs

• Sheet size options: 4×6″, 8.5×11″, 11×17″, 13×19″, 17×22″, 
• Roll size options: 17” x 100’, 23” x 100’, 36” x 100’, 42” x 100’
• Base material: Not provided
• Brightness: 98%
• Weight: 218 gsm
• Thickness: 11.8 mil

Pros

• Ultra-glossy for gloss lovers
• Available in sheets and rolls
• Lots of size options, including small sizes
• Vivid colors

Cons

• Roll options not widely available
• Color profiles can be finicky if not using Canon printers

The Canon Photo Paper Pro Platinum is part of Canon’s high-end line, though the price doesn’t reflect that. It is an affordable paper, especially given the quality. The Platinum paper is an ultra-high gloss offering with a gloss level of 35 percent at 60 degrees. The high level of shine and 98 percent brightness will help produce incredibly rich color and deep contrast, making it ideal for images that you want to have some extra pop when printed.

The Platinum paper comes in a good range of sizes in sheets and quite a few roll options for when you want to print really large. The rolls are only available on specialty photography websites, however, such as Adorama. 

Canon has specifically designed this to be used with its printers, in this case, the PIXMA line. When used with the ChromaLife100+ inks, Canon says prints will have a life of over 200 years. That doesn’t mean that you can’t use it with other printers, but you won’t have a pre-loaded ICC profile (a specific guide for a printer that accounts for the printer, ink, and paper combination for accurate color). You will have to download a profile from Canon’s website and install it or do some testing to find the best built-in option.

Best for art prints: Hahnemühle Photo Rag 308 gsm

SEE IT

Specs

• Sheet size options: 8.5 x 11”, 11 x 17″, 13 x 19”, 17 x 22”, 24 x 30″ 24 x 36″, 35 x 46.75″
• Roll size options: 17” x 39’, 24” x 39’, 36” x 39’, 44” x 39’, 44″ x 65′
• Base material: Cotton rag
• Brightness: 90%
• Weight: 308  gsm
• Thickness: 18.8 mil

Pros

• Available in 188, 308, or 500 gsm 
• Roll and sheet options
• Single and double-sided options
• Acid- and lignin-free for excellent age resistance
• Beautiful texture

Cons

• Expensive for the everyday user

For photographers producing high-end fine art prints, Hahnemühle papers are some of the absolute best options available. The Photo Rag Matte option has excellent weight and thickness, resulting in sturdy paper with a beautiful texture. It produces rich blacks and excellent, accurate colors. And it has no additional optical brighteners and is acid and lignin-free, making it archival and museum-quality. Your prints on this paper will last for a very long time.

While many photographers prefer a matte finish for fine art prints, the Photo Rag does come in everything from satin and pearl to glossy and even metallic. It also comes in three different weights, depending on the finish and size you are looking for. Should you want to print large, rolls are also available, though you will need to look at specialty photography stores.

Best for black and white: Canson Infinity Platine Fibre Rag 310gsm

SEE IT

Specs

• Sheet size options: 5 x 7”, 8.5 x 11”, 11 x 17”, 13 x 19”, 17 x 22”
• Roll size options: 17” x 50’, 24” x 50’, 36” x 50’, 44” x 50’, 60” x 50’
• Base material: Cotton rag
• Whiteness: 89%
• Weight: 310 gsm
• Thickness: 15.6 mil

Pros

• Wide variety of sizes, including extra large
• Roll and sheet options
• Smooth, velvet-like finish
• Exceptional quality

Cons

• Expensive for the everyday user

Canson designed its Infinity Platine Fibre Rag to take the familiar fiber-based papers of the darkroom into the digital age. Black and white photographers, especially those who have spent time in a darkroom, will love the classic look and feel. It has a smooth, satin finish that provides a touch of gloss for richer blacks but not so much that it becomes reflective. 

The paper is acid-free, making it archival and long-lasting. It dries instantly and has high water resistance, so you can stress less about your print getting damaged. The 310 weight gives it a nice heft. You can find this paper in an extensive range of sizes, from small five by 7-inch sheets all the way up to a 44-inch roll or even 60-inch wide roll at some sites.

Things to consider when buying the best photo paper

On the surface, choosing a paper seems like a pretty straightforward task. But once you start looking into things, you will notice how many nuanced differences there are, which can get quite overwhelming. However, some factors are more important than others, so read on to learn about the main features to consider.

Printer type

Before narrowing in on a photo paper for your needs, you first need to establish the type of printer you will be using, either inkjet or laser. Photo papers are designed explicitly for one or the other based on how they transfer ink or toner. Using the wrong type of paper can damage your printer or at least result in a low-quality print. 

Inkjet printers are the preferred choice for photo printing needs because of their color accuracy and higher resolution. For the best results, you’ll want a photo-specific printer. While there are a few photo papers for laser printers, the majority you see will be for inkjets. Therefore, all of the papers in this roundup are intended for inkjet printers.

Finish

The finish of a paper refers to the surface texture and reflectivity. A paper’s texture and gloss level can make a significant difference in how your images appear when printed. It also impacts the longevity of a print, how it will hide imperfections, and the ideal display method. While there are some niche options, there are three primary choices for paper finish: Glossy, luster, and matte.

• Glossy: As the name implies, glossy papers have a high gloss finish and reflect a lot of light. Glossy papers are the most widely used for photographs because they provide rich, vibrant color and deep contrast. The downside is that they very easily show fingerprints, creases, and other blemishes. They can also have glare issues due to how reflective the surface is.
• Luster: Luster papers–sometimes called pearl, semi-gloss, or satin–still have some shine but are less reflective than glossy. The lower level of reflectivity makes them a popular choice among photographers as glare isn’t as much of an issue when framed and displayed. They have an excellent color and contrast range and tend to have a slight texture on the paper, nicely accentuating image content.
• Matte: Matte papers are the opposite of glossy. These resemble art papers, such as watercolor paper, with their fully non-reflective surface. Because of this, they more easily hide blemishes, which is ideal in certain circumstances. You can find matte papers in a range of texture amounts, from smooth to heavily textured, and different thicknesses as well. Matte papers are popular for fine art prints.

Weight and thickness

Weight and thickness are closely intertwined in their impact but refer to different things, so you will frequently see both items mentioned in product descriptions. The weight refers to the heft of a paper and is measured in grams per square meter (gsm) or pounds. For context, basic copy paper is usually 20 lbs, and standard photo paper is around 60 lbs.

Thickness is simply the thickness of a sheet of paper and is expressed in mils (or thousandths of an inch). As you might assume, thicker papers are more rigid, which can be helpful, especially when printing large, as you don’t need to be quite so cautious about bends and creases. 

A common misconception is that a heavier weight will equal a thicker paper, but this is not always the case. Weight essentially reflects the amount of pulp pressed into a square meter, and you can have heavy-weight papers that are still thin, such as RC papers. A heavy-weight paper does not necessarily correlate with a thicker paper but does result in a stiffer piece.

Brightness

Brightness, whiteness, and shade are three different factors that all impact how bright a paper–and, therefore, your printed image–appears. It’s important to note that brightness often gets confused with whiteness, though they refer to two different things.

Brightness is the measurement of how much blue light gets reflected off a paper on a 1-100 scale, with the higher number being a brighter paper. The paper’s brightness will impact how bright the brightest part of your image can be and, as a result, the dynamic range as a whole. So if you want a vivid, high-contrast print, a high brightness level will be better.

Whiteness measures the reflection of all wavelengths of light, not just blue light. Because of this, it is much more perceptible to our eyes, and it will be easier to see a difference in whiteness levels than brightness. It is also measured on a 1-100 scale, with higher numbers appearing brighter. However, higher numbers can also have a blueish or cooler tint to them, which will impact the look of your print.

Shade doesn’t take into consideration reflected light at all and instead refers to the actual color of the paper. There are three main options for shade: True white, Blue white, and Cream white. Of course, the lighting conditions you are viewing a paper will also impact the shade. Still, under the same light, true white will look balanced and truly white, while blue-white will have a blue tint, and cream white will have a warm tone.

So, how does all this affect your print? A bright, white paper will give you a higher dynamic range with rich whites and blacks and more vivid color. In contrast, a paper with lower brightness, whiteness, and a cream shade will be duller. There is imagery that calls for warmer, duller papers, but you will want to choose what makes sense for you.

OBAs

Tied in with brightness and whiteness, but worth paying attention to, in particular, is the use of optical brightness agents (OBAs). OBAs make papers artificially brighter, resulting in numbers beyond the 100-point scale. While this does make the paper brighter, OBAs are known to fade over time and aren’t as archival or long-lasting as papers without OBAs. So, if you are printing museum-quality prints, you should avoid OBAs. 

Q: Is it worth printing your own photos?

FAQs

Final thoughts on the best photo paper

• Best matte: Canson Infinity Rag Photographique Matte
• Best for framing: Epson Ultra Premium Luster
• Best glossy: Canon Photo Paper Pro Platinum
• Best for art prints: Hahnemühle Photo Rag 308 gsm
• Best for black and white: Canson Infinity Platine Fibre Rag 310gsm

While you can get a good idea of a paper from looking at the specs, nothing beats holding it in your hand and seeing your print on it. If you are torn between finishes or types, you can usually find sample packs available from companies to test the options before investing in a whole pack or roll. Printing photos takes a lot of trial and error, so be prepared to go through some different paper types and printer settings before finding the sweet spot for your work.

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best photo paper in 2023 appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best overall		Sony RX100 VII		SEE IT	This compact camera offers a versatile lens, 1-inch sensor, and superb autofocus abilities.
Best for street photography		Ricoh GR III		SEE IT	The Ricoh GR III offers a unique zone focus system for capturing decisive moments.
Best budget		Panasonic LUMIX ZS100		SEE IT	The Panasonic LUMIX ZS100 has an impressive zoom range at a budget price.

Compact cameras aren’t just for beginners anymore. In recent years, camera manufacturers have really stepped up the quality and build of the pocket-sized devices that they are selling. These days, many compact cameras feature large sensors, fast lenses, and excellent autofocus that will help you capture the world in a way that your smartphone can’t. Quite a few even have stellar video chops as well, pulling down high-res footage with impressive bit rates. Whether you are just getting started with photography or are a seasoned pro, the best compact cameras have a way of bringing joy to picture-making. 

• Best overall: Sony RX100 VII
• Best for street photography: Ricoh GR III
• Best for vloggers: Sony ZV-1 II
• Best high-end: Leica Q2 Monochrom
• Best budget: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100

How we chose the best compact cameras

When selecting cameras for this guide, we considered sensor size, autofocus capabilities, and a variety of use cases for each camera. When making our selections, we also considered prices, while it’s not unusual for high-end compact cameras to cost over a thousand dollars, it was important to include a few lower-priced items that would appeal to beginning photographers. 

Our final consideration when making our selections for this guide was that we were picking cameras that we have actually shot with or reviewed before.

The best compact cameras: Reviews & recommendations

Compact cameras are great tools for capturing everything from travel and street photography to candid family moments. These small image-making devices are easy to keep on hand, so you don’t miss the shot. Here are our favorite compact cameras for a range of situations and users.

Best overall: Sony RX100 VII

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: The RX100 VII has a massive one-inch sensor for its extremely compact size, which means it can produce images that your smartphone won’t be able to compete with. 

Specs

• Resolution: 20.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: 1-inch
• Lens: 9 to 72mm (35mm equivalent: 24 to 200mm)
• Image stabilization: Digital, optical in integrated lens
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo Hybrid
• Weight: 10.65 ounces
• Dimensions: 4 x 2.29 x 1.69 inches

Pros 

• Large 1-inch CMOS sensor
• Solid zoom capabilities
• Excellent autofocus and subject tracking
• Shoots 4K video and has a built-in mic input

Cons

• Expensive

The RX100 VII is one of the best compact cameras on the market. It has a versatile zoom range and a fairly fast lens, but the stacked 1-inch CMOS sensor elevates this compact camera to the next level. 

Sony’s excellent autofocus system, the flip-up touchscreen LCD, and the clever pop-up OLED viewfinder are also big selling points. You can shoot up to 20fps without blackouts in burst mode. It can shoot oversampled 4K video and includes a built-in mic input, so whatever you are shooting will look and sound great. 

Sure, it’s pricey, but ultimately, a lot of these features used to only be found in expensive, top-of-the-line cameras aimed at sports photographers—having the ability to shoot so fast with AF tracking is pretty remarkable.

Best for street photography: Ricoh GR III

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: The Ricoh GR III offers a 24.2-megapixel sensor with a fast 28mm lens in a highly compact body. Plus, the Snap Focus system helps you get the shot with fast-moving moments on the street.

Specs

• Resolution: 24.2 megapixels
• Sensor size: APS-C
• Lens: 18.3mm (35mm equivalent: 28mm)
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 3-axis
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC
• Weight: 9.07 ounces
• Dimensions: 4.3 x 2.4 x 1.3 inches

Pros 

• Large APS-C sensor
• Fast f/2.8 lens
• Built-in ND filter
• Easy controls

Cons

• Battery life isn’t great
• Viewfinder is a separate purchase

The lightweight Ricoh GR III is a street photographer’s dream compact camera. Weighing just over nine ounces, it’s small enough to easily fit in your pocket and not notice it there. Ricoh built the camera around a 24.2-megapixel APS-C sensor, which results in sharp, attractive DNG stills. It supports in-camera raw editing and wireless connection to a smartphone to speed up sharing.

One thing that sets the GR III out in terms of street photography is the Snap Focus system. This feature allows you to automatically jump to a specified focus distance when fully pressing the shutter button. That zone-focusing method is ideal for quickly capturing decisive moments during street photography shoots.

The lens on the Ricoh GR III is a 28mm equivalent with a fast f/2.8 maximum aperture. It can focus as close as 3.9 inches. Or you can turn on the dedicated macro setting and focus from 2.4 to 4.7 inches. A built-in neutral density (ND) filter helps with shooting on bright days when you still want a slow shutter speed or wide aperture. The nine-blade aperture allows for smooth bokeh. When you are working with slower shutter speeds, the three-axis Shake Reduction System helps obtain sharp images even when shooting handheld.

Should you want a tighter focal length for street photography outings, the Ricoh GR IIIx is essentially the same camera but with a 40mm equivalent lens.

Best for vloggers: Sony ZV-1 II

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: This is the best compact camera for vloggers because it was designed with vloggers in mind—if video content is your thing, you can’t go wrong with the ZV-1 II.

Specs

• Resolution: 20.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: 1-inch
• Lens: 6.9 to 17.6mm (35mm equivalent: 18 to 50mm)
• Image stabilization: Digital (video only)
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo Hybrid
• Weight: 10.3 ounces
• Dimensions: 4.15 x 2.4 x 1.84 inches

Pros 

• Directional 3 capsule microphone for easy audio capture
• Supports HLG and S-Log2/3 for color grading
• Real-time Eye AF

Cons

• No viewfinder

Sony specifically designed the ZV-1 II for vlogging, but it’s a great tool for shooting stills as well. It uses the same stacked one-inch sensor found inside the RX100 but ditches the viewfinder for a directional three-capsule mic for capturing quality audio. 

The camera offers a flip-out touchscreen and can shoot 4K video at 30p and Full HD up to 120 fps. A giant record button can be found on the top of the camera for extremely easy operation. The 18 to 50mm equivalent zoom lens is extremely versatile, allowing you to record yourself or larger groups as well as tighter shots.

The autofocus is fast, real-time Eye AF is supported, and a background de-focus function lets you blur out backgrounds in a shot by simply pressing one button. Additionally, it has a product showcase mode, which is handy for bloggers who want to keep the focus on the products they’re displaying, even if their face comes into the frame.

Best high-end: Leica Q2 Monochrom

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It’s a unique but beautiful camera that takes stunning black-and-white images.

Specs

• Resolution: 47.3 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens: 28mm
• Image stabilization: Optical in integrated lens
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.6 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.1 x 3.1 x 3.6 inches

Pros

• Excellent low-light performance
• Attractive body design
• Excellent viewfinder

Cons

• Expensive
• Only takes black-and-white images

The Leica Q2 Monochrom isn’t for everyone, that’s for sure. After all, it’s a compact digital camera that only takes black-and-white images. And it has a classic Leica price tag. But it’s a stunning body that creates stunning images. The full-frame 47.3-megapixel sensor produces truly beautiful image quality. It also has excellent low-light performance with limited noise, even at higher ISOs.

The camera is fitted with a 28mm lens and is nice and compact, making it very travel-friendly. It can shoot 4K video and has reliable and accurate autofocus. It may look like an old-school film camera, and it acts like it in that it only shoots monochrome, but inside is some impressive tech.

If you like the Q2 in every way other than the black-and-white aspect, Leica also makes a Q2 that shoots color.

Best budget: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: The Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 is the best budget compact camera because it’s a camera with an impressive zoom capability at a bargain price.

Specs

• Resolution: 20.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: 1-inch
• Lens: 9.1 to 91mm (35mm equivalent: 25 to 250mm)
• Image stabilization: Optical in integrated lens, sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC
• Weight: 11.01 ounces
• Dimensions: 4.4 x 2.5 x 1.7 inches

Pros 

• Extensive zoom capabilities
• 4K photo mode lets you create stills for 4K videos
• f/2.8-5.9 Leica DC lens

Cons

• No articulating touchscreen

Though there is a newer version of this camera–the Panasonic Lumix ZS200–this older model still is very capable and will save you a bit of money. This compact zoom camera is built around a 20mp 1-inch sensor and has an f/2.8-5.9 25-250mm equivalent lens. 

It can shoot 4K/UHD video at 30p and 24p, has a mode called 4K photos that lets you create jpegs from 4K videos, and Depth from Defocus autofocus tech. It shoots 10fps continuously or 5pf with autofocus. 

There is a 3-inch fixed touchscreen, a 1.04m-dot EVF, and built-in WiFi for easy sharing. Although it lacks some of the more advanced features found in other cameras in this guide, you simply can’t beat the price.

Things to consider when buying the best compact cameras

A high-quality compact camera is something that professional shooters enjoy just as much as beginners. But before you buy the most expensive, highest megapixel camera on the market, it’s important to do some research. 

The most important thing to consider when selecting the best compact camera is how you will be using it, where you will be taking it and what you intend to shoot with it.

Zoom range

If you are planning to take it on vacation with you or use it to capture fun, candid moments of your family, something with a decent zoom range will probably fit the bill. If you are more interested in street photography and lifestyle photography, a camera with a fast fixed lens might be more your speed. 

Some compact cameras offer lots of zoom, up to 20x or more. That extra reach comes at a cost, though. More glass typically translates into a bigger camera. And shooting at max zoom can be tricky since the lens aperture typically slows down on the long end. Even if the aperture isn’t a problem, holding it steady enough can be tricky. 

Fixed lenses typically offer faster apertures and enable larger sensors inside the camera. Of course, that means you lose any zoom capabilities.

Manual controls

Professionals and advanced amateurs will appreciate cameras that give them manual control, while a newer shooter might enjoy something with more full-auto settings and innovative touchscreen control. If you are planning to shoot mostly video with your compact camera, look for something that has the ability to plug in a microphone and doesn’t limit recording capabilities. 

While some compact cameras offer manual controls, they may require you to access those settings through menus because they don’t have the physical dials or buttons required to enable quick manual control.

Price

Ultimately price is a big thing to consider as well. A compact camera with a large sensor, fast shooting capabilities, and a nice lens will cost a lot more than something with a more simplified build.

FAQs

Final thoughts on the best compact cameras

• Best overall: Sony RX100 VII
• Best for street photography: Ricoh GR III
• Best for vloggers: Sony ZV-1 II
• Best high-end: Leica Q2 Monochrom
• Best budget: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100

Ultimately, finding the best compact camera for you has a lot to do with what and where you plan to be shooting. A fixed lens compact might be best for street photography or candid portraits, while something with a long zoom might work better for travel and adventure photography. If video is important, consider a camera with excellent 4K capabilities and no recording limits.

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best compact cameras of 2023 appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best overall		Sony FX30		SEE IT	The FX30 cinema camera offers a solid balance of quality, features, and price.
Best for 6K		Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K G2		SEE IT	This Blackmagic camera offers 6K video in a compact, relatively affordable package.
Best budget		Canon EOS R50		SEE IT	The R50 will help you create quality videos for less.

There isn’t one to rule them all when it comes to cameras for YouTube. Instead, finding the best camera for YouTube videos comes down to what kind of content you’re creating. If you’re streaming Among Us from your desk, you may not need as many frills as someone filming themselves leaping off waterfalls. Depending on your circumstances, the right camera may be one that is ultra-portable and allows you to frame yourself as you walk and talk. Or perhaps the most important consideration is getting the best video quality possible. We’ll guide you through the best cameras for YouTube, no matter what type of content you want to create.

• Best overall: Sony FX30
• Best upgrade: Sony FX3
• Best for 6K: Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K G2
• Best for vlogging: Sony ZV-E1
• Best for streaming: Logitech C922x Pro Stream Webcam
• Best for travel: Sony RX100 VII Premium Compact Camera
• Best action camera: GoPro HERO12 Black
• Best budget: Canon EOS R50

The best cameras for YouTube: Reviews & Recommendations

Whether you’re just starting up your YouTube channel or looking to upgrade your content to continue growing your audience, these cameras will help bring out the best in your work.

Best overall: Sony FX30

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 26 megapixels
• Sensor size: APS-C
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: CFexpress Type A / SD
• Weight: 1.2 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.1 x 3.1 x 3.3 inches

Pros

• Capable of quality stills as well
• Advanced and accurate autofocus
• Compact and lightweight
• 4K video up to 120p

Cons

• No viewfinder
• 4K 120p comes with a 1.6x crop

Dedicated cinema cameras are typically quite expensive, but Sony’s entry to its cinema line offers plenty of features borrowed from Sony’s high-end cinema cameras at a very reasonable price. The FX30 can record 10-bit 4K video, which is oversampled from a 6K crop in a Super 35 format. It’s capable of up to 120 frames per second, though that comes with a 1.6x crop. 

The FX30 offers 14 stops of dynamic range and a Dual Base ISO system for more flexibility in bright and low-light situations. It also provides lots of control when it’s time to sit down and edit as well, thanks to the S-Cinetone, S-Log3, and HLG profiles. Should you not want to spend time editing, you can apply LUTs in-camera.

As with most Sony cameras, the FX30 features an advanced Fast Hybrid autofocus system. That includes real-time Eye AF and tracking for both humans and animals. Focus breathing compensation allows you to smooth out focus breathing in-camera with select lenses in 4K up to 60p or 120p after recording. Finally, the 5-axis in-body image stabilization helps smooth content when shooting handheld. All in all, the FX30 offers a lot for the price, making it the best for most YouTube creators. 

Best upgrade: Sony FX3

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 12.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: CFexpress Type A / SD
• Weight: 1.6 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.1 x 3.3 x 3.1 inches

Pros

• Superb low-light performance
• Compact and lightweight
• Built-in fan
• High-quality 4K video

Cons

• No viewfinder
• Resolution tops out at 4K

If you like the form factor of the FX30 but want a step up in terms of sensor size, the FX3 is your best bet. Sony built the FX3 around a full-frame 12.1-megapixel sensor. The larger sensor size with low resolution results in larger pixels for gathering more light. That means better low-light performance than the FX30. You’ll be able to get clean footage even with ISOs as high as 12800, which is very impressive. It also offers 15 stops of dynamic range for more flexibility in tricky lighting situations. 

The FX3 also shines over the FX30 in slow-motion performance. It’s capable of 4K 120p video with no crop and with internal 10-bit 4:2:2 sampling or 16-bit raw output. You’ll have access to S-Cinetone, as well as S-Log-3, S-Gamut3, S-Gamut3.Cine, and HLG HDR. These match well with higher-end Sony cinema cameras in case you’re using the FX3 as a second camera for your YouTube shoots.

The FX3 comes with Sony’s impressive autofocus system with superb eye and subject tracking and plenty of helpful settings. The compact body with the important controls on the top of the device makes it easier to hold and adjust settings while shooting. And it’s compatible with cages, XLR adapter handles, and other accessories for even better ergonomics during long shoots. 

Best for 6K: Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K G2

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 21.2 megapixels
• Sensor size: Super35
• Lens mount: CanonEF
• Image stabilization: None
• Memory card slots: Slot 1: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II), Slot 2: CFast 
• Weight: 2.65 pounds
• Dimensions: 7.08 x 4.84 x 4.41 inches

Pros

• Affordable for what you get
• Easy-to-use menus
• Superb 6K video quality
• Compatible with optional EVF

Cons

• No built-in ND filters
• No built-in stabilization

Sometimes, 4K footage just doesn’t cut it. If you need high-quality 6K content, the Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K G2 (BMPCC 6K G2) is one of the best options available. That’s in part due to its relatively approachable price, which makes it easier for those just getting started. It utilizes the Canon EF mount, which also makes buying lenses more approachable, as you won’t need to buy high-end cinema lenses. 

Despite the reasonable price, the BMPCC 6K G2 is a truly advanced cinema camera. Blackmagic built the camera with the same 6K S35 sensor as the 6K Pro, which results in 16 stops of dynamic range and dual native ISO up to 25,600. It’s capable of 6144 x 3456 6K footage up to 50 fps or 6144 x 2560 (6K 2:4:1) up to 60 fps. 

This camera for YouTube features a five-inch articulating touchscreen and an option electronic viewfinder for working on bright days. Though most YouTube filmmakers will want a cage, the camera is very compact and feels very nice in the hand on its own. Of course, the low price means there are some compromises. It doesn’t offer built-in ND filters, so you’ll want to pick those up for your lenses. It also doesn’t provide any stabilization, so if you are shooting handheld, you’ll want a gimbal for smooth videos. 

To learn more, check out our full review of the Blackmagic Design Pocker Cinema Camera 6K G2.  

Best for vlogging: Sony ZV-E1

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 12.9 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Image stabilization: Yes
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.1 pounds
• Dimensions: 4.8 x 2.8 x 2.1 inches

Pros

• Very compact for a full-frame camera
• Impressive stabilization
• Useful AI-based features
• Dust and moisture resistant

Cons

• Single SD card slot

The Sony ZV-E1 is a seriously impressive camera for YouTube content. It’s capable of 4K video at up to 120p or full HD up to 240p. The body features a better heat-dissipating structure, so you should be able to get up to 60 minutes of recording time even at 4K60p. Beyond heat limitations, there are no recording time limits, making long clips possible.

Sony packed this camera with an extensive list of content creator-friendly features. That includes an AI processing unit that enables impressive AI recognition and autofocus tracking. It can automatically crop the frame to focus on a specific subject. Multiple Face Recognition allows you to track multiple subjects in the frame. The Product Showcase Setting can switch AF tracking between you and your product to make product spotlights easier. Plus, a bokeh switch allows you to adjust the level of bokeh that you want.

The ZV-E1 offers impressive five-axis optical image stabilization or smooth footage even without a gimbal. The Optical Active Mode offers better stabilization when walking, and the Dynamic Active Mode adds electronic stabilization for even more stable footage with fast movements or longer focal lengths. Despite all these features, the camera body is one of the most compact full-frame cameras available, making it easier to hold when recording and more travel-friendly. If you need impressive specs in a small package for vlogging, this is one of the best available full-frame cameras for YouTube.

Best for streaming: Logitech C922x Pro Stream Webcam

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 2 megapixels, 1080p video resolution
• Sensor size: Size unspecified
• Lens mount: N/A
• Image stabilization: None
• Memory card slots: None
• Weight: 5.7 ounces
• Dimensions: 3.7 x 1.7 x 2.8 inches with clip

Pros

• 60 fps possible at 720p
• 78-degree field of view
• Two built-in omnidirectional mics
• Auto light correction

Cons

• No privacy shutter

The folks at Logitech created the C922x streaming camera with YouTubers in mind. It streams in full HD at 30 fps. Or, should you need something faster, you can drop the resolution down to 720p for 60 fps. Your streamed content won’t suffer from any sort of lag or distortion. And the glass lens on this webcam will result in sharper content compared to plastic lenses.

The C922x offers light correction so that shadows and natural lighting shifts don’t mar your content. Its autofocus function means you can get animated without losing followers. And the two built-in omnidirectional microphones can sub in for a full mic if you haven’t picked up a professional option yet. You will sound natural and clear throughout your stream, even if you move around a lot.

Plus, the C922x Pro includes a free six-month subscription to XSplit, which can simplify your live-streaming process. This is one of our favorite webcams in general, but it makes for an especially fantastic choice for those sharing their content on YouTube.

Best for travel: Sony RX100 VII Premium Compact Camera

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 20.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: 1-inch
• Lens mount: N/A
• Image stabilization: Yes
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC
• Weight: 10.65 ounces
• Dimensions: 4 x 2.29 x 1.69 inches

Pros

• Compact and portable
• Versatile 24-200mm equivalent built-in zoom lens
• Fast autofocus
• 4K video

Cons

• Expensive for a compact camera

Don’t let the Sony RX100 VII’s size deceive you—it’s an extremely powerful vlogging camera for YouTube built for capturing vivid images and 4K video on the go. Its Zeiss Vario Sonnar large-aperture, high-magnification zoom lens delivers stunning image quality up close and at a distance. It covers a 35mm equivalent range of 24-200mm, making it ideal for everything from group selfies to wildlife photos and videos. The tiny size and built-in lens make it a perfect travel companion, especially if you like to travel light.

The AI-aided, real-time tracking keeps your subjects in focus, while Active SteadyShot mode provides image stability as you walk and talk. The 4K 30/24 fps video is crisp, while full HD offers 120 fps for epic slow-motion footage. A Photo Capture function is built right into the camera, so you can grab 8.29-megapixel stills from your 4K footage to use as thumbnails in your videos or social media promos. A built-in microphone with audio output means you won’t need to bring an extra mic and travel lighter, but should you want it, there is a 3.5mm external microphone port to add a mic as well.

Best action camera: GoPro HERO12 Black

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 27 megapixels
• Sensor size: 1/1.9-inch
• Lens mount: N/A
• Image stabilization: Yes, HyperSmooth 6.0 stabilization
• Memory card slots: Single slot: microSD/microSDHC (UHS-III)
• Weight: 5.4 ounces
• Dimensions: 2.8 x 2 x 1.3 inches

Pros

• Highly compact and portable
• Extremely rugged and waterproof design
• Award-winning stabilization
• 5.3K video at 60 fps

Cons

• Battery won’t last all day

The GoPro HERO12 is the go-to action-oriented camera for YouTube, thanks to its durable body and impressive image-stabilization software. Even videos of serious action, such as mountain biking or trail running, will be smooth and stable thanks to the HyperSmooth 6.0 digital stabilization. As has been the case for the last handful of GoPro cameras, the body is extremely rugged and adventure-ready, even without a case. It’s waterproof to 33 feet on its own, and the water-repelling lens will make photos and videos in wet conditions sharper.

The HERO12 allows up to 5.3K60p video for professional-looking footage. Built with content creators in mind, its larger sensor provides more flexibility when it comes to aspect ratios. It can record at a nearly square 8:7, which provides the largest vertical field of view of any GoPro yet. That’s ideal for vertical videos you want to share to YouTube Shorts or on TikTok or Instagram. Or you can create immersive 16:9 POV video thanks to the HyperView digital lens. 

The Hero12 truly has an extensive list of features to love, especially for active and adventurous YouTube creators, making it a top choice when it comes to cameras for YouTube. We’ve highlighted the Creator Edition here, which comes with all the accessories you may need for your YouTube videos, including the Media Mod with built-in microphone, the Volta Battery Grip, and Light Mod. If you know you’ll be using the GoPro exclusively for action and don’t need the accessories, you can save some money and opt for the camera-only version.

Best budget: Canon EOS R50

SEE IT

Specs

• Resolution: 24.2 megapixels
• Sensor size: APS-C
• Lens mount: Canon RF
• Image stabilization: None
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC
• Weight: 13.2 ounces
• Dimensions: 4.6 x 3.4 x 2.7 inches

Pros

• Budget-friendly
• Light and compact
• Advanced autofocus
• Beginner-focused features

Cons

• No stabilization

You don’t have to settle for a less-than-impressive camera if you need a budget camera for YouTube. Canon’s EOS R50 packs plenty of advanced features into this beginner-friendly body that is quite affordable, especially for what you get. It’s also extremely lightweight and compact. Hand-holding the camera is easier for longer periods, and you’ll be more likely to actually bring it with you. The lightweight design also helps with recording smooth videos since there is no built-in stabilization.

The R50 is capable of 6K oversampled 4K 30p video or full HD at up to 120p for slow-motion playback. Those are some seriously impressive video specs for such an affordable camera. It also provides access to advanced autofocus features such as whole-area tracking, subject detection, and Movie for Close-up Demo Mode. You can continuously record for up to one hour, making it an excellent vlogging camera for single takes. 

To learn more, check out our full review of the EOS R50. 

Things to consider when shopping for the best cameras for YouTube

YouTube is a vast world with nearly endless types of content. The social media platform hosts informal vertical shorts, pro-level documentaries, inspiring movies, vlogs, and everything in between. Because of that, finding the best cameras for YouTube can be painstaking since each type of content calls for different features and specs. For example, someone creating casual vlogs of their daily life will have much different camera needs than someone working on high-end productions. 

The sheer number of cameras available makes it even more challenging. But we aim to help filter through the noise. Below, you’ll find some key features to look out for to help guide you through which camera is best for you and your YouTube content. 

Autofocus

One of the most important features of all cameras for YouTube is autofocus abilities. Your YouTube videos won’t look very polished if the focus is frequently off. While most modern cameras offer impressive autofocus features with AI-based tools, they aren’t all created equal. You also may need specific features depending on what you film. 

For example, if you show off products frequently, you may want a camera with a product showcase mode to make focus changes easier when filming on your own. If your YouTube videos focus on people who move around in the frame, you’ll want excellent face and eye tracking with settings geared towards that. 

Sensor size

Sensor size isn’t everything, but it does have an impact on your videos. Full-frame cameras offer a slew of upgrades to image quality, including bigger pixels and the ability to capture more light. More light results in more vibrant colors as well as better performance in low-light situations. However, if you know you won’t be filming in many dark situations and need a budget-friendly camera for YouTube, a smaller sensor will still provide plenty of quality and performance. 

Stabilization

One big factor that can make people click away from your YouTube content is shaky footage. Videos with lots of movement are hard to watch, so it’s important to smooth out your content in some way. Luckily, many mirrorless cameras and cinema cameras offer in-body image stabilization (IBIS) to help produce smoother videos even when shooting handheld on the go. 

That said, not all cameras offer the same level of stabilization. If you know you’ll be recording while moving around a lot, focus on cameras with more successful stabilization features. You may also want to invest in a gimbal, as IBIS can only do so much. 

Audio

Beyond stabilization, poor audio quality is another surefire way to push people away from your YouTube content. If viewers can’t hear you or your subject talking, they won’t stick around. Some cameras for YouTube offer fairly good-quality audio, but you’ll want to invest in an external microphone for the best quality. 

The type of mic that you’ll need varies depending on what type of content you are filming, but no matter what, you’ll want to be sure that your camera offers a mic input. A hot shoe is also valuable for mounting the mic unless you opt for a cage that allows for accessories. And if you are really serious about your audio, a headphone jack for monitoring levels will be crucial. 

Size & build quality

For those who record on the go or during travels, camera size may be a key factor in selecting a camera. Likewise, if you shoot handheld a lot, a compact body is important. It’s no fun to lug around a big, bulky camera. It can even limit how long you’ll be able to film. If you know you won’t be using your camera on a tripod very often, look for compact, lightweight bodies. 

Another important thing to consider is build quality. Some cameras for YouTube are built to be rugged devices with weather sealing and durable materials. However, even those aren’t intended to be submerged in water or dropped down cliffs. For adventure-focused YouTube content, an action camera may be the way to go. 

Live-streaming capabilities

If you’re a streaming YouTuber positioned in front of your state-of-the-art gaming PC or doing nuanced tutorials, you will have some specific camera requirements that differ somewhat from other types of content. For many, a webcam is the easiest option for streaming purposes, as you won’t have to fuss with camera settings or finding a place for a bulky camera. If that’s the case, look for a webcam that produces a top-notch image, offers a good frame rate, stays in focus, and isn’t drastically impacted by changes in room light. This will ensure that you capture all your video in detail without inconsistencies in lighting or focus as the subject moves in-frame.

If you want to step beyond a webcam for your streams or want something that can be used for more than just your live streams, a mirrorless camera may be the way to go. Some camera manufacturers, such as Canon, make it easy to use their cameras as webcams, which can simplify the process. Some even offer built-in support for YouTube live streams. Be sure to check what the connectivity options are, and also think about what type of tripod or mount you’ll need for the camera as well. 

FAQs

Final thoughts on the best cameras for YouTube

• Best overall: Sony FX30
• Best upgrade: Sony FX3
• Best for 6K: Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K G2
• Best for vlogging: Sony ZV-E1
• Best for streaming: Logitech C922x Pro Stream Webcam
• Best for travel: Sony RX100 VII Premium Compact Camera
• Best action camera: GoPro HERO12 Black
• Best budget: Canon EOS R50

We loathe to say it, but content is king. When shopping for the best cameras for YouTube, you’ll need to consider what type of content you’ll be creating. Providing commentary on a DOTA stream has far different demands than capturing extreme sporting events or documenting trips to the backcountry. It will mean the difference between buying a stationary streaming webcam and purchasing a mirrorless, full-frame wonder of modern photography.

No matter what you’re creating, you’ll want a decent image, but just how good really depends on what kind of standards you can afford to support and what kind of standards you’re growing audience demands of you.

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best cameras for YouTube in 2023 appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best overall		Canon EOS R6 Mark II		SEE IT	The R6 Mark II offers the right mix of features and price for most people.
Best budget		Canon EOS RP		SEE IT	The EOS RP is the most affordable full-frame camera you can buy.
Best for video		Sony A7S III		SEE IT	This Sony camera is a true hybrid powerhouse.

Sensor size isn’t everything, but full-frame cameras do have their advantages. A little extra silicon real estate certainly doesn’t hurt when it comes to image quality and depth of field. That’s what makes full-frame cameras so popular with photographers and video shooters. The phrase “full-frame” means that the sensor inside the camera is the same size as a single photo taken on 35mm film. This familiar size means that standard lenses will produce the angle of view you’d expect if you were shooting with an older film camera. Full-frame cameras are not all created equal, though; different options are best for different situations and types of photographers. Below, you’ll find the best full-frame cameras for a range of use cases so you can choose one that fits your needs.

• Best overall: Canon EOS R6 Mark II
• Best upgrade from a smartphone: Sony a7C II
• Best DSLR: Nikon D850
• Best for beginners: Nikon Z5
• Best for video: Sony a7S III
• Best budget: Canon EOS RP
• Best full-sized for pros: Nikon Z9
• Best regular-sized for pros: Sony A1
• Best for sports: Canon EOS R3

How we chose the best full-frame cameras

The writers and editors at Popular Photography have been testing and reviewing cameras for decades and have had hands-on time with almost every camera on this list. This group was compiled through a mix of first-hand testing, spec comparisons, editorial reviews, and user feedback. We started with a roster in the dozens and whittled it down to these selections based on features like autofocus performance, resolution, video capabilities, price, and more. 

The best full-frame cameras: Reviews and Recommendations

Just because a camera has a big chip inside doesn’t make it a winner. We curated this list of the best full-frame cameras by selecting models best suited for different kinds of photographers and content creators. And while upgrading to full-frame is certainly no replacement for hard work and talent, it also doesn’t hurt.

Best overall: Canon EOS R6 Mark II

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It’s the right balance of size, price, and resolution for the majority of advanced shooters.

Specs  

• Resolution: 23.2 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame 
• Lens mount: Canon RF
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.3 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.4 x 3.9 x 3.5 inches

Pros 

• Excellent balance of features
• Advanced video features
• Fantastic image quality
• Tough build
• Great for capturing action and sports

Cons

• Not as many tactile controls as some would like

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II is a fantastic do-it-all camera with a 24.2-megapixel full-frame sensor. It inherited the more expensive EOS R3’s autofocus, though the R6 Mark II won’t match that performance since it doesn’t feature a stacked sensor. Even still, Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocus is superb, with fast and accurate results. One feature we especially love is the Auto Subject Tracking mode, which means you don’t need to continuously dig in the menus if you shoot a range of subjects. You can even change the sensitivity of when the camera should switch between subjects, which is very handy. 

The R6 Mark II sees a significant upgrade from the first iteration in burst shooting. It’s capable of  12 frames per second (fps) with the mechanical shutter and a speedy 40 fps with the electronic shutter. The 40 fps even works with 12-bit raw files, which is impressive. It made photographing fast-action sports such as diving and mountain biking much easier.  

Canon built this camera as a hybrid machine, and as such, it offers excellent video specs as well. It’s capable of 4K 60p full-width internal recording, which is oversampled from 6K. It can also handle 6K 12-bit raw external recording. The Detect Only AF keeps focus on your subject, even if they come from or go behind an obstacle like a wall, which results in smoother videos with limited focus shifting. 

As we would expect from a Canon camera, the R6 Mark II offers excellent all-around image quality with plenty of dynamic range for more flexibility when editing. It’s a little more expensive than our best beginner pick but packs some compelling features that make it a better fit for high-end video or high-speed sports shooting. If you’re looking for more resolution, you can step up to the Canon EOS R5, which offers 45 megapixels of resolution and more tactile controls, but it also costs considerably more.

To read more about the Canon EOS R6 Mark II, check out our full review.

Best upgrade from a smartphone: Sony a7C II

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: The simplified layout and lack of viewfinder make it an easy jump from a smartphone, but a huge leap in image quality.

Specs 

• Resolution: 33 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.1 pounds
• Dimensions: 4.9 x 2.8 x 2.5 inches

Pros 

• Simple controls
• Compact body
• Excellent image quality

Cons

• More advanced shooters may miss the built-in viewfinder

Searching for the best full-frame cameras for your average person? The Sony a7C II is essentially a more compact version of the ultra-popular Sony a7 IV. It boasts a 30-megapixel image sensor with seven stops of stabilization in an extremely compact body. The small size makes it an ideal choice for world travelers or anyone who doesn’t want to lug around a bulky camera.  

The a7C II offers 10 fps continuous shooting with Sony’s hybrid autofocus system, including eye detection. Video shooters will appreciate the 10-bit full-frame 4K 30p video. You can also record 4K up to 60p if you’re okay with a crop. The viewfinder is a bit small, but the 2.36m-dot OLED provides good quality for composing your shots. The one annoyance is the single SD card slot, but setting this fact aside, the Sony a7C II checks all the right boxes for most people.

Best DSLR: Nikon D850

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Nikon’s high-res DSLR can still compete with the best of them.

Specs 

• Resolution: 45.7 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Nikon F
• Image stabilization: None
• Memory card slots: Slot 1: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II), Slot 2: CFexpress Type B / XQD
• Weight: 2.01 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.7 x 4.9 x 3.1 inches

Pros 

• High-end sensor with lots of resolution
• Tried-and-true Nikon layout and menu system
• Excellent dynamic range
• Lag-free optical viewfinder

Cons

• Faces fierce competition from Nikon’s high-res mirrorless cameras

Since its release in 2017, the Nikon D850 has pretty much owned the full-frame DSLR camera crown. This 45-megapixel camera combines high resolution with lighting-fast autofocus and up to 9 fps continuous shooting. It’s capable of 4K video recording, an 8K time-lapse mode, and one of the most popular lens mounts in existence. It’s telling that our pick for the best full-frame DSLR is now four years old. The Nikon D850 remains incredibly hard to beat.

Best for beginners: Nikon Z5

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It’s a very affordable way to get into full-frame mirrorless.

Specs 

• Resolution: 24.3 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Nikon Z
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.3 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.28 x 3.96 x 2.74 inches

Pros 

• Affordable
• Compact
• Uses Nikon’s full-frame Z mount, which has lots of new lenses coming
• Two card slots

Cons

• Limited physical controls

Searching for the best camera for beginners? Nikon’s entry-level Z5 is part of the company’s full-frame mirrorless Z-series, aimed directly at beginners. It uses a 24-megapixel image sensor with 4.5 fps continuous shooting, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, 4K video recording, built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, and a high-resolution electronic viewfinder. It even features dual SD card slots for instant backup or extra storage. It’s a great full-frame mirrorless camera to start out on and still gives you plenty of room to grow.

Best for video: Sony a7S III

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: The low-resolution sensor works in the A7S III’s favor when it comes to shooting uncropped video and low-light perfomance.

Specs  

• Resolution: 12.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: CFexpress Type A / SD (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.5 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.1 x 3.8 x 3.2 inches

Pros 

• Large pixels spread across a full-frame sensor
• Un-cropped video at high-resolutions
• Fantastic low-light performance

Cons

• 12.1-megapixel sensor may underwhelm photographers

Sony’s a7S III was a long time coming, but when it arrived, it became an instant favorite of videographers everywhere. Whether you are creating videos for YouTube or documenting weddings, the a7S III is up for the task. Despite using only a 12-megapixel image sensor, it can shoot 4K video at up to 120fps with 10-bit internal 4:2:2 recording, 16-bit RAW output to an external recorder, and Sony’s top-of-the-line autofocus system. Essentially, you’re trading resolution for phenomenal video performance without springing for a camera that can shoot 8K.

If you want more resolution for photos with strong video performance, the a7 IV is another favorite for content creators. It offers a larger 33-megapixel sensor, giving you more room for cropping and printing large. And it’s capable of up to 4K 60p video. You can check out our full review to learn more about this camera for hybrid shooters.

Best budget: Canon EOS RP

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It’s hard to find a current-gen full-frame camera for less.

Specs

• Resolution: 26.2 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Canon RF
• Image stabilization: Digital, 5-axis (video only)
• Memory card slots: Single slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.07 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.2 x 3.3 x 2.8 inches

Pros 

• Very affordable
• Impressive resolution at this price
• Excellent image quality
• Uses Canon’s RF mount

Cons

• One memory card slot
• Awkward rocker controls

The Canon EOS RP is the most affordable full-frame camera on the market. And yet it still delivers the goods, including a 26-megapixel image sensor, 5 fps continuous shooting, Dual Pixel CMOS AF autofocus, 4K video, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, and a 2.36m-dot electronic viewfinder. Conspicuously absent at this price point are in-body image stabilization and dual card slots, but with a price tag of just $999, there are some tradeoffs with resolution and slowed-down autofocus.

Best full-sized for pros: Nikon Z9

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Nikon’s flagship mirrorless camera captures high-resolution photos at super-high speeds.

Specs  

• Resolution: 45.7 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Nikon Z
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: CFexpress Type B / XQD
• Weight: 2.9 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.9 x 5.9 x 3.6 inches

Pros 

• Super-fast captures
• High-resolution sensor
• Tons of tactile controls
• Silent operation
• Advanced metering and AF tracking
• Tons of customizability

Cons

• Big
• Expensive

Nikon decided it wasn’t interested in moderation when it designed the relatively absurd Z9. It’s a mirrorless camera without any kind of mechanical shutter. Its sensor reads out super fast, so it can capture huge bursts at 20 fps with full AF tracking and AE metering going the whole time. Plus, it’s built like a tank with lots of weather sealing, so it’s meant to last for years, even under harsh punishment. If you can find one in stock and afford it, there’s literally no situation in which this camera body would be out-classed.

Best regular-sized for pros: Sony A1

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It looks like a regular A7 camera, but Sony stuffed this pro camera to the gills with features.

Specs

• Resolution: 50.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Sony E
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Dual slot: CFexpress Type A / SD (UHS-II)
• Weight: 1.6 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.07 x 3.81 x 2.74 inches

Pros 

• Packs pro features into a normal-sized mirrorless body
• Super-fast capture
• High-resolution sensor
• Advanced AF settings

Cons

• Clunky menu system
• Expensive

Sony’s flagship mirrorless camera takes a similar approach to Nikon’s Z9 in that it can do pretty much anything you’d ever want it to do. Its 50-megapixel sensor reads out super fast, which allows it to produce long bursts of 30 fps captures at full resolution. The a1 is also capable of 8K 30p and 4K 120p video in 10-bit, making it an excellent tool for videographers. Despite its decidedly professional stats, it packs into the shape of a typical A7-series mirrorless camera rather than adding a heavy vertical grip. It’s one of the best full-frame cameras we’ve ever used.

Best for sports: Canon EOS R3

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: This perfectly balanced body puts the emphasis on speed at every step of the process.

Specs  

• Resolution: 24.1 megapixels
• Sensor size: Full-frame
• Lens mount: Canon RF
• Image stabilization: Sensor-shift, 5-axis
• Memory card slots: Slot 1: CFexpress Type B, slot 2: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
• Weight: 2.2 pounds
• Dimensions: 5.9 x 5.6 x 3.4 inches

Pros 

• Unmatched AF tracking
• Fantastic build quality
• Perfect resolution for its purpose

Cons

• Eye AF feature doesn’t feel super useful in some instances

Rather than trying to ratchet up the speed on its high-resolution cameras, Canon purpose-built a camera for sports photographers. It features a super-rugged coating on the outside and a deep grip that makes it very easy to hold, even when there’s a huge lens attached to the front. The autofocus menus have pages and pages of customizability, but the people and object tracking works fantastically right out of the box. Its viewfinder is big and bright, thanks partly to the Eye AF system, which tracks your eye to determine where to focus. If you’re a sports shooter, We think this is the best camera you can buy at the moment.

What to look for when shopping for the best full-frame cameras

Even though all these cameras share the same-sized sensor, they differ in a wide variety of ways. Here are some things to consider when shopping for the best full-frame cameras.

Resolution

Just because these cameras come toting large sensors doesn’t necessarily mean they’re going to be packed with pixels. Some cameras, like the Sony A7S III, opt for a lower 12-megapixel resolution to employ bigger pixels that can pull in more light. The sweet spot for most people likely falls somewhere in the 20-30-megapixel range. That’s plenty of resolution for most things (even large prints), but won’t require an army of memory cards or a super-powerful computer at home when it’s time to edit your shots.

Camera design & layout

You’re going to become very familiar with your camera over time, but a solid layout with intuitive controls can speed up that learning process. If you’re already using a company’s cameras, you’ll likely have an easier time moving to one of their new models than if you switch manufacturers. Some photographers—typically those on the more advanced side of things—prefer more tactile controls like buttons and dials. They speed up the process of navigating the camera because they allow for setting changes without the need to dig into an on-screen menu. Beginners or those moving from smartphone photography may prefer the on-screen menus because they’re more familiar. There’s no right or wrong answer in this case. It all comes down to preference.

Rotating screen

Most full-frame cameras come toting advanced screens that measure three inches or more on the diagonal. Some, however, offer displays that flip around in various directions. While you may not think you need this feature, it can be extremely handy for shooting videos or even taking the occasional selfie. Even if those situations won’t come up very often for you, a rotating screen can provide opportunities to shoot carefully framed shots at very odd and unique angles. It’s a tool you’ll likely use more than you think.

ISO range

Camera companies sometimes boast of maximum sensitivity settings that climb up to over 100,000. Those are impressive on paper, but the real world offers a much different view. Even high-end digital cameras typically top out around ISO 6,400 when it comes to getting usable photos. Sometimes, you can go up to 10,000 and beyond, but expect a ton of grain and less-than-accurate colors. When I go that high, I usually assume I’m going to convert to black-and-white because monochrome images deal with noise much better.

Memory card slots

If you’re moving up to a full-frame body because you want to start doing professional work, consider a body with two memory card slots. That way, you can shoot two copies of every photo in real-time in case one of the cards gets damaged or corrupted. Charging people for photos and then losing them because you didn’t have a real-time backup is a total amateur move and can seriously damage your reputation. You will hear people tell you that they shoot with a single card “all the time,” and it’s always “fine,” but it only takes one catastrophe to cause havoc.

FAQs

Final thoughts on the best full-frame cameras

• Best overall: Canon EOS R6 Mark II
• Best upgrade from a smartphone: Sony a7C II
• Best DSLR: Nikon D850
• Best for beginners: Nikon Z5
• Best for video: Sony a7S III
• Best budget: Canon EOS RP
• Best full-sized for pros: Nikon Z9
• Best regular-sized for pros: Sony A1
• Best for sports: Canon EOS R3

The world of photography equipment can be tricky to navigate alone. With so many options to choose from, finding the best full-frame cameras for you can be a challenge. Gone are the days when there were only a few choices, all of them prohibitively expensive and all of them aimed at professionals. But if you take the time to evaluate your needs as a photographer, educate yourself on the core features that tend to drive up the price of a camera, and explore some of the top picks above, you can confidently make the leap to full-frame and take your photography to the next level.

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best full-frame cameras of 2023 appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

We’re big fans of just about every type of Instax camera Fujifilm offers, but the Square format cameras hold a special place in our hearts. The twee analog prints employ a 1:1 aspect ratio that more closely mimics the square-ish Polaroid images from decades ago. Right now, you can save $40 (a 31 percent discount) off of the stylish Fujifilm Instax SQ6 instant camera during Amazon’s October Prime Day.

Fujifilm Instax SQ6 Instant Film Camera $89 (was $129)

SEE IT

This square camera shoots square instant film. The SQ6 offers automatic controls with a powerful flash. The package includes several colored filters you can put over the flash in order to create unique color effects. It’s not the most advanced Instax camera around, but it’s built for fun. It comes in four stylish colors and relies on a pair of CR2 batteries, which are small and relatively easy to find on the market.

This is an modern camera with an old school feel. Just be sure to stock up on Instax Square film when you order.

The post Save $40 on a Fujifilm Instax Square SQ6 instant film camera during Amazon Prime Day appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Best overall		Sony 512GB CFexpress Type B Tough Memory Card		SEE IT	It offers consistently fast speeds and is very rugged.
Fastest		Lexar Diamond Series Professional 256GB CFexpress Type-B		SEE IT	The fastest card for data hungry cameras.
Best Type A		ProGrade Digital 160GB CFexpress Type A Cobalt Memory Card		SEE IT	The best option for Sony users.

CFexpress cards have quickly become the storage media of choice. They offer much faster speeds than SD, XQD, or CompactFlash. CFexpress cards also come in larger capacities than other memory cards, making them ideal for cameras that produce excessive amounts of data in the form of high-quality video or high-resolution photographs. Of course, they come at a high cost, but the best CFexpress cards provide better performance and allow you to get the most out of high-specced cameras. 

• Best overall: Sony 512GB CFexpress Type B Tough Memory Card
• Fastest: Lexar Diamond Series Professional 256GB CFexpress Type-B
• Best Type A: ProGrade Digital 160GB CFexpress Type A Cobalt Memory Card
• Best Type B: SanDisk 512GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B
• Best large capacity: Angelbird AV PRO CFexpress MK2 Type B Card – 4 TB
• Best budget: SanDisk 64GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B

How we picked the best CFexpress cards

The writers and editors have been involved in the photography industry for decades. During that time, we have seen dramatic changes in the memory card field, with multiple new card formats introduced and ever faster and larger storage options available. Throughout our careers, we have used cards by just about every manufacturer.

When selecting the best CFexpress cards, we prioritized read and write speed. We also chose a variety of storage capacities to suit different types of shooters. And lastly, durability was a key consideration, as cards this expensive should be able to stand up to some harsh conditions.

The best CFexpress cards: Ratings & recommendations

CFexpress cards come with blazing-fast speeds and large capacities. That makes them ideal for photographers and videographers who produce large files and lots of them. The options below should fit the needs of just about anyone looking for a CFexpress card, including someone looking for a more budget-friendly option.

Best overall: Sony 512GB CFexpress Type B Tough Memory Card

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Sony’s Tough line of CFexpress Type B cards provide consistent speeds in a highly durable package.

Specs

• Max read speed: 1,700 MB/s
• Max write speed: ​​1,480 MB/s
• Storage capacity: 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB

Pros

• Provides very consistent speeds
• Highly durable to withstand 15-foot falls
• Protected against extreme temperatures, X-rays, electrostatic, and UV lighting
• Compatible with apps to recover files and track condition

Cons

• Only available in three storage capacities

Sony’s CFexpress Type B cards are some of the most well-rounded cards available, earning them our top spot. Lab testing resulted in read speeds of up to 1,700 MB/s and write speeds of up to 1,480 MB/s. Of course, you won’t be able to get those speeds in practice, but real-world speeds are also near the top of the pack across the board. Its burst shooting numbers are a bit below the competition, but it’s still plenty fast for everything other than the heaviest bursts. It offers consistency and reliability, two crucial features of a CFexpress card.

Beyond speed, Sony designed its cards to be, as the name says, tough. They can withstand falls up to 15 feet and have been rigidity tested to 70 newtons of force. Sony says they are three times stronger than the CFexpress standard for bending. They can also withstand extreme temperatures, X-rays, electrostatic, and intense UV light. Even if you are an expedition photographer, these cards will hold up to some serious abuse.

All memory cards have a finite number of write cycles and eventually fail. But, with these Sony cards, you’ll get access to Sony’s Media Scan Utility. Once downloaded to your computer, it can scan a card to tell you its condition, so you don’t shoot on a card nearing or at its end.

Fastest: Lexar Diamond Series Professional 256GB CFexpress Type-B

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: Lexar’s newest card provides the fastest burst shooting results of any CFexpress.

Specs

• Max read speed: 1,900 MB/s
• Max write speed: 1,700 MB/s
• Storage capacity: 128GB or 256GB

Pros

• Extremely fast read and write speeds
• Shock, vibration, and temperature proof
• Supports smooth 8K video

Cons

• Expensive

Lexar recently released this Diamond Series card, with bold claims of it being the fastest CFexpress ever. It states that you’ll get 1,900 MB/s max read speeds, 1,700 MB/s max write speeds, and a minimum sustained write speed of 1,600 MB/s. Unsurprisingly, those numbers don’t hold up in testing done by PetaPixel. Other cards have faster peak and sustained read and write speeds, but it still is very near the top of the pack. 

Where this card does beat out all the competition is in burst performance. It can shoot at the Canon R5’s highest burst setting for just over 30 seconds before the buffer limit slows it down, which is nearly double any other card. So if you are photographing sports or fast-moving wildlife, this will be the card to use because of its burst capabilities. 

Finally, this Lexar card meets the Compact Flash Association’s qualifications for VPG 400 certification. That means it has a minimum sustained write speed of 400 MB/s and can keep up with even the most professional cinema video cameras.

Best Type A: ProGrade Digital 160GB CFexpress Type A Cobalt Memory Card

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: It offers fast read and write speeds at lower prices than the Sony alternative.

Specs

• Max read speed: ​​800 MB/s
• Max write speed: 700 MB/s
• Storage capacity: 160GB

Pros

• Resistant to temperature extremes, shock, vibration, and X-rays
• Fast and reliable speeds
• Metal casing provides better thermal conductivity for less overheating

Cons

• Only available in 160GB

When Sony released the a7S III, it also introduced a new card type—the CFexpress Type A. The later-released a1 also utilized this new memory card. Sony was the only company producing the CFexpress Type A for a bit, but ProGrade entered the market to provide an alternative. Though the Prograde version is still not cheap by any means, it is more affordable than Sony’s, saving you some money.

Despite the lower price, ProGrade’s CFexpress Type A has the same advertised speeds as Sony’s. It has a stated max read speed of 800 MB/s and max write speed of 700 MB/s. And in-camera results show that these two cards perform nearly the same. It is also highly durable and can survive extreme temperatures, heavy vibrations, shocks, and X-rays. 

Best Type B: SanDisk 512GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: SanDisk’s CFexpress Extreme PRO card provides a lifetime warranty and excellent performance at lower prices than its competitors.

Specs

• Max read speed: 1,700 MB/s
• Max write speed: 1,400 MB/s
• Storage capacity: 64GB, 128GB, 256GB, 512GB

Pros

• More affordable than other options
• Lifetime warranty
• Can record raw 4K video
• Compatible with SanDisk’s data recovery software

Cons

• 64GB capacity has lower read/write speeds

SanDisk has long been one of the staples in the memory card industry, and its CFexpress Type B card continues that tradition. Like all cards, it won’t reach the promised 1,700 MB/s read or 1,400 MB/s write speeds, but it has shown to be near the top of the pack across all measurements in user testing. So you’ll get plenty fast speeds across the board and excellent burst performance as well.

It’s capable of raw 4K recording, making it suitable for cinematographers. And it’s backward compatible with select XQD cameras, as long as a firmware update has been provided. With this SanDisk card, you’ll be able to utilize its RescuePRO Deluxe data recovery software, which is useful for situations where you accidentally delete files prematurely. SanDisk also offers a lifetime warranty, giving you some peace of mind.

Best large capacity: Angelbird AV PRO CFexpress MK2 Type B Card – 4 TB

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: If storage capacity is the most important thing to you, Angelbird’s 4TB card provides more room than any other CFexpress card. 

Specs

• Max read speed: 1,785 MB/s
• Max write speed: 1,550 MB/s
• Storage capacity: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB

Pros

• Huge storage capacity
• Can capture up to 12K+ video
• Protected against shock, vibration, overheating, and temperature from 14 to 158°F
• Purchase includes hardware and software data recovery within the 3-year warranty

Cons

• Very expensive

Many CFexpress cards top out at 512GB of storage, with a few offering 2TB. Angelbird brought something new to the table with its massive 4TB card. It offers more storage space than anything else available at the time of writing. 

The large storage makes it a great choice for high-end video work that produces large files. And it goes beyond just storage size to support lofty projects with heavy data needs. Angelbird promises minimum sustained read and write speeds of 1,785 MB/s and 1,300 MB/s, respectively. It also says it’s capable of 17,850 MB/s and 1,550 MB/s of maximum read and write speeds. 

It supports 12K+ raw video recording, making this card a good investment as video quality continues to increase. And investment it is, thanks to the high price point. But, you’ll get free hardware and software data recovery within the 3-year warranty period. And if you register your card within 30 days, you’ll get a lifetime warranty. 

Best budget: SanDisk 64GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B

SEE IT

Why it made the cut: This SanDisk 64GB CFexpress Type B card is the most affordable option that is still high-quality and trustworthy.

Specs

• Max read speed: 1,500MB/s
• Max write speed: 800MB/s
• Storage capacity: 64GB, 128GB, 256GB, 512GB

Pros

• Comparatively affordable
• Good read/write speeds
• Backwards compatible with some XQD cameras

Cons

• Write speeds aren’t as fast as other options

Unfortunately, CFexpress cards are the most expensive memory cards as they are the newest variety and offer the fastest speeds. But this 64GB card from SanDisk is much more affordable than other options. And despite the lower price, it comes from a trusted company, so it’s less likely you’ll have a card failure and lose all of your images. The 64GB is the cheapest option, but if you need a larger capacity, the other sizes are also more affordable than the rest of the cards on this list. 

SanDisk’s card is compatible with raw 4K video, making it suitable for videographers and vloggers. Should something unfortunate happen, SanDisk offers a limited lifetime warranty. You’ll also have access to free RescuePRO Deluxe data recovery software in case you need to recover files that you accidentally delete.

This CFexpress card offers read speeds up to 1,500MB/s, which is slower than all but the CFexpress Type A card, though not by much. Unfortunately, the write speed is where things dip as a result of the lower price. But 800MB/s is still plenty fast for most people, and the price makes it an enticing alternative.

Things to consider before buying a CFexpress card

CFexpress cards have quickly become the new standard, and more companies have entered the already crowded memory card field. Even Nikon is making CFexpress cards now. But, as with any camera gear decision, the first step is considering the type of shooting you will be doing. For example, if you primarily shoot video, you’ll likely want a card with a large capacity and fast speeds. But if you mainly shoot portraits, you can get away with slower speeds and lower storage capacity, saving you some money. 

It’s worth pointing out that while there are lots of CFexpress options available, the differences between them are small. You might get ever so slightly faster speeds from one over another, but because they are all so fast already unless you are pushing your camera—and memory card—to the limits, you likely won’t pick up on that. You can’t go wrong with any of these cards or many of the other CFexpress offerings not listed here. Instead, the key factor is simply if the card is compatible with your camera.

Type A versus Type B

Deciding between Type A and Type B cards comes down to what camera you use, as they will only be compatible with one type. So, look at your camera’s specs to verify which type of card it can use and double-check the CFexpress type before purchasing one. 

Type B cards are the same size as XQD memory cards, meaning you can use them in cameras that accept XQD, though usually only with a firmware update. Type B is also faster than Type A. Even though it seems like it would be the opposite, Type B is the more mainstream card choice at this point in time (yes, B came before A), with more cameras able to use them, and thus most people should look for a Type B.

Sony is the only camera maker that is currently utilizing Type A cards. They are smaller than Type B, so they are not cross-compatible. 

Storage capacity

All memory cards have a finite amount of storage and will come in a variety of storage capacity options. How big of a card you need depends on the kind of content you create, the file sizes from your camera, and how often you’d like to change your card. 

8K video will require more space than shooting a handful of JPEG files, for example. And, the file sizes from an APS-C camera will be much smaller than the Sony a1, meaning you won’t need as much storage space. And lastly, some like to use multiple small cards and swap them out more frequently as protection should a card fail, while others like a single card with loads of storage to keep from needing to change them out. This is a matter of personal preference and shooting style, so simply choose what makes the most sense for you.

Read & write speed

CFexpress cards are the fastest memory cards available at this time, but they still vary in how fast they can open (read) or save (write) data. Some brands even offer multiple levels of CFexpress cards intended for different types of shooters. 

While the general speed of even the base level of CFexpress cards is plenty fast for the average user, some situations call for the fastest speeds. For example, if you are a videographer shooting 8K video or a sports photographer relying on quick and long bursts of action, you’ll want to look for top-tier cards with faster read and write speeds. 

It’s important to note that the speeds listed on the packaging will not be the same as what you’ll actually get. This is because those speeds are based on lab testing by manufacturers and are not real-world results. In fact, some throttle write speed to around 300 MB/s to prevent overheating.

Camera compatibility

The last piece of the puzzle, though perhaps the most important, is whether the card will even work with your camera. Cameras can only utilize specific card formats, or sometimes they accept two different ones. 

Lastly, some cameras will only be able to accept certain lines from manufacturers. For example, The Canon R5 can use ProGrade’s Cobalt line but not the Gold cards. Be sure to research and verify which type of memory card works with your camera before purchasing, especially since CFexpress cards are quite pricey.

FAQs

Final thoughts on the best CFexpress cards

• Best overall: Sony 512GB CFexpress Type B Tough Memory Card
• Fastest: Lexar Diamond Series Professional 256GB CFexpress Type-B
• Best Type A: ProGrade Digital 160GB CFexpress Type A Cobalt Memory Card
• Best Type B: SanDisk 512GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B
• Best large capacity: Angelbird AV PRO CFexpress MK2 Type B Card – 4 TB
• Best budget: SanDisk 64GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B

CFexpress cards are the newest option for camera memory cards but have already become the default choice for pros and serious enthusiasts alike. They upped the game in terms of quick read and write speeds and large storage capacity, but with that comes a high price. These cards are an investment but will help you get the most out of your data-hungry cameras.

Why trust us

PopPhoto has a long history of delivering the opinions of some of the sharpest and most prolific camera dorks the world has to offer. Since 1937, we’ve been reviewing cameras, providing wisdom from well-known photographers, and generally just nerding out about all that goes into making great pictures. Our current crop of writers and editors have decades of professional photography and camera writing experience among them. Collectively, we’ve probably shot with just about every camera and lens combo you can imagine—as well as some obscure stuff you may not even know about. Remember the Casio Tryx folding camera? PopPhoto does.

We also get that buying a camera is a big decision, which is why we’re dedicated to helping folks choose the right one (or, in our case “ones”) for their needs. Case in point: Handing over top dollar for an expensive rig may leave you unsatisfied if it doesn’t fit your preferred shooting style. Sure, a $6,000 sports-oriented DSLR can capture landscapes, but do you really need to do it at 30 frames-per-second? No, you don’t.

The post The best CFexpress cards for 2023 appeared first on Popular Photography.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.